نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
نویسنده
دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Egypt can be considered as one of the countries that has spent more than80%of its rule in emergency conditions in the last hundred years, in such a way that the exceptional situation has become a normal condition.Although the political system of this country is governed democratically, the design of the institution of emergency conditions in the Egyptian constitution and the ease of using this tool have led the executive branch to authoritarianism in this country,the authority of the President by referring to Article3 of the Law of Emergency Conditions prevents other powers from functioning and has a wide legislative and judicial power.The impartiality of the judicial system has been challenged due to the selection of military court judges from high-ranking officers and the authority to enter into matters related to emergency conditions and limiting public courts to civil lawsuits.Research by descriptive-analytical method,tries to answer the question that according to Egypt's constitutional rights, how is the administration of the country in emergency situations?The hypothesis of the research is that in Egypt's constitutional law system, in the state of emergency, the administration of the country's affairs is entrusted to the president and the government is governed by a form of authoritarianism. It is worth mentioning that the high incidence of the issue and the experiences resulting from it can bring strategies to activate the capacity of the seventy-ninth article of the Iranian Constitution in the field of legal management of emergency situations.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)