نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشآموختۀ دکتری رشتۀ حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Egypt can be considered one of the countries that has spent more than 80% of the last hundred years under emergency conditions, in such a way that the exceptional situation has become a normal condition. Although the political system of this country is governed democratically, the design of the institution of emergency conditions in the Egyptian constitution and the ease of using this tool have led the executive branch to authoritarianism, in such a way that the authority of the President, by referring to Article 3 of the Law of Emergency Conditions, prevents other powers from functioning and grants him wide legislative and judicial powers. The impartiality of the judicial system has been challenged due to the selection of military court judges from high-ranking officers and their authority to enter into matters related to emergency conditions, while public courts are limited to civil lawsuits. This research tries to answer the question of how, according to Egypt's constitutional law, the administration of the country is conducted during emergency situations. The hypothesis of the research is that in Egypt's constitutional law system, in the state of emergency, the administration of the country's affairs is entrusted to the President and the government is governed by a form of authoritarianism. This research has been compiled using a descriptive-analytical method based on library sources and reliable websites.
کلیدواژهها [English]