نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2 استادیار گروه حقوق دانشگاه مازندران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In terms of epistemological foundations, the theory of rational choice has entered the social sciences from statistics, mathematics and economics and is based on two principles: the first principle: "the individuality of human action" and the second principle: "human actions are aimed at benefit". According to the first principle, this theory is individualistic and bases its unit of analysis on the individual, and the theory of rational action of collective behaviors is also interpreted with regard to the behavior of individual members of that group, because it is based on the basis that the system. It depends on his intellectual and value conditions, and one's choices cannot be attributed to the whole community, and collective behaviors do not negate the power of individual choice.. For example, the electoral behavior of a society is the best example of using rational choice. This essay has investigated the application of this method in the analysis of drafting and revising the basic law, or what is called the design of the constitution, with an emphasis on the thought of John Elster. The purpose of the research is to present a plan regarding how and why people's participation in drafting and creating the constitution
کلیدواژهها [English]
)