1. Bigdali. Saeed & Asanloo. Akbar (1402). The Inequality of Related Contracts in Modern French Contract Law with a View to Its Admissibility in Iranian Law. Comparative Law Studies. 14(2). pp. 271-246 (In Persian(.
2. Bozorgmehr. Amir Abbas & Mehrani. Ghazal (1402). Reforms in the French Code of Obligations. Tehran: Adalat Publications (In Persian(.
3. Bredin. Jean-Denis. (1956). Remarks on the Jurisprudential Conception of the Simulated Act. Quarterly Review of Civil Law. pp. 261–280 (In French(.
4. Bredin. Jean-Denis. (1956). Remarques sur la conception jurisprudentielle de l’acte simulé. Revue trimestrielle de droit civil. pp. 261–280
5. Carbonnier. Jean. (2019). Civil Law. Obligations. Volume 4. 24th ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (In French(.
6. Carbonnier. Jean. (2019). Droit civil. Les obligations. Tome 4. 24th éd. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France
7. Chénedé. François. (2018). Le nouveau droit des contrats et des obligations. 2e éd.. Paris: Dalloz
8. Cozian. Maurice. (1994). Crime and Punishment: Fiscal Fulminations Against Under-the-Table Payments in Cases of (In French(.
9. Cozian. Maurice. (1994). Crime et châtiment : fulminations fiscales contre les. dessous-de-table en cas de
10. Dagot. Michel. (1967). La simulation en droit privé. Paris : LGDJ
11. Dagot. Michel. (1967). Simulation in Private Law. Paris: LGDJ (In French(.
12. Flour. Jacques. Aubert. Jean-Luc. & Savaux. Éric. (2022). Les obligations. L’acte juridique. 17e éd. Paris : Sirey
13. Flour. Jacques. Aubert. Jean-Luc. & Savaux. Éric. (2022). Obligations. The Legal Act. 17th ed. Paris: Sirey (In French(.
14. Foulon-Pignaniol. Anne. (1960). Le mariage simulé . Revue trimestrielle de droit civil. pp. 217–240
15. Foulon-Pignaniol. Anne. (1960). Simulated Marriage. Quarterly Review of Civil Law. pp. 217–240 (In French(.
16. Gabuli Darafshan. Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi & Mohseni. Saeed (1402). The Concept and Effects of Relative Nullity. Dynamic Financial Economics. 17(33). pp. 271-246 (In Persian(.
17. Gabuli Darafshan. Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi; Mohseni. Saeed; Rabati. Mahsa (2019). General Rules of Invalidity in Commercial Law. Comparative Law Studies. 11(1). pp. 99-121 (In Persian(.
18. Ghestin. Jacques. Goubaux. Gilles. & Fabre-Magnan. Muriel. (2023). Treatise on Civil Law. The Effects of Contract. 5th ed. Paris: LGDJ (In French(.
19. Ghestin. Jacques. Goubaux. Gilles. & Fabre-Magnan. Muriel. (2023). Traité de droit civil. Les effets du contrat. 5e éd. Paris : LGDJ
20. Ghomami. Majid (1377). Freedom to Choose a Contracting Party. Legal and Political Studies. 1. pp. 55-26 (In Persian(.
21. Hinfray. Pierre. (1982). Du paradoxe juridique de la simulation. Administrer. pp. 11–22
22. Hinfray. Pierre. (1982). On the Legal Paradox of Simulation. Administrer. pp. 11–22 (In French(.
23. Karimi. Abbas (2012). An Attempt to Organize the Theory of Non-Influence of Considerations. Perspectives on Judicial Law. 17(58). pp. 188-157 (In Persian(.
24. Karimi. Abbas; Izadpanah. Gholam Reza (1400). Comparative Study of Non-Influence with Relative Nullity in Iranian and French Law. Legal Civilization. 4(8). pp. 293-280 (In Persian(.
25. Karimi. Abbas; Shabani Kandsari. Hadi (2017). The Legal Status of Considerations as a Status of Validity. Invalidity and Non-Influence. Private Law Studies. 47(4). pp. 702-683 (In Persian(.
26. Katouzian. Naser. (2019). General Rules of Contracts. Vol. 2. Conclusion and Validity of Contract. The Theory of Invalidity and Non-Influence. Vol. 4. Tehran: Ganj Danesh. (In Persian(.
27. Larroumet. Christian. (2020). Civil Law. Obligations. Volume 3: The Effects of Contract. 3rd ed. Paris: LGDJ (In French(.
28. Larroumet. Christian. (2020). Droit civil. Les obligations. Tome 3 : Les effets du contrat. 3e éd. Paris : LGDJ.
29. Leduc. Frédéric. (1999). Reflections on the Nominee Agreement. Quarterly Review of Civil Law. pp. 283–302 (In French(.
30. Leduc. Frédéric. (1999). Réflexions sur la convention du prête-nom. Revue trimestrielle de droit civil. pp. 283–302
31. Malaurie. Philippe. Aynès. Laurent. & Stoffel-Munck. Philippe. (2022). Obligations. 12th ed. Paris: Defrénois (In French(.
32. Malaurie. Philippe. Aynès. Laurent. & Stoffel-Munck. Philippe. (2022). Les obligations. 12e éd. Paris : Defrénois
33. Malinvaud. Philippe. (2005). Law of Obligations. 9th ed. Paris: Litec (In French(.
34. Malinvaud. Phillippe. (2005). Droit des obligations. 9ème éd.. Paris : Litec
35. Marty. Gabriel and Raynaud. Pierre. (1998). Civil Law. Obligations. Vol. 1. Sources. 1st vol.. 9th ed. Paris: Sirey (In French(.
36. Marty. Gabriel et Raynaud. Pierre. (1998). Droit civil. Les Obligations. T. 1.. Les Sources. 1re vol.. 9ème éd.. Paris: Sirey
37. Masson. Florent. (2021). Enforceability: Unity or Plurality. Quarterly Review of Civil Law. pp. 1–30 (In French(.
38. Masson. Florent. (2021). L’opposabilité : unité ou pluralité. Revue trimestrielle de droit civil. pp. 1–30
39. Masson. Florent. (2021). Remarks on the Jurisprudential Conception of the Simulated Act. Quarterly Review of Civil Law. pp. 261–280 (In French(.
40. Masson. Florent. (2021). Remarques sur la conception jurisprudentielle de l’acte simulé. Revue trimestrielle de droit civil. pp. 261–280
41. Ophèle. Claude. (2012). Simulation. Répertoire de droit civil. Paris : Dalloz
42. Ophèle. Claude. (2012). Simulation. Repertory of Civil Law. Paris: Dalloz (In French(.
43. Pakbaz. Siamak (1402). Explanation of French Civil Code; Reforms of 2016. Fifth Edition. Tehran: Mizan Publications (In Persian(.
44. Rouast-Bertier. Laurence. (1993). Fictitious Company and Simulation. Revue des sociétés. pp. 725–748 (In French(.
45. Rouast-Bertier. Laurence. (1993). Société fictive et simulation. Revue des sociétés. pp. 725–748
46. Saghy-Cadenas. Pedro. (2012). Contract Simulation. A Comparative Study in French and Venezuelan Civil Law. Doctoral dissertation in law. Paris: Panthéon-Assas University (In French(.
47. Saghy-Cadenas. Pedro. (2012). La simulation de contrat. Étude comparée en droit civil français et vénézuélien. Thèse de doctorat en droit. Paris : Université Panthéon-Assas
48. Sanhouri. Abdolrazzaq Ahmad (1946). Al-Mujiz fi Nazriyah al-Ama’ah il-Taltza’amat. Beirut: Dar Ihya’a al-Turaht al-Arabi (In Persian(.
49. Saqri. Mohammad (1385). The Validity of Apparent Correctness in Civil Law (A Discussion in Iranian and French Law). Public Law Research. 8(18). pp. 139-199 (In Persian(.
50. Shoarian. Ebrahim & Torabi. Ebrahim. (1395). Law of Obligations: A Comparative Study of the Reform Plan of the Law of Obligations of France with Iranian Law and International Documents. Vol. 2. Tehran: Shahr Danesh Publications (In Persian(.
51. Terré. François. Simler. Philippe. & Lequette. Yves. (2023). Les obligations. 13e éd. Paris: Dalloz
52. Terré. François. Simler. Philippe. & Lequette. Yves. (2023). Obligations. 13th ed. Paris: Dalloz (In French(.
53. Vignal. Patrick. (1998). La transparence en droit privé des contrats. Publications de l’Université Aix-Marseille. pp. 227–245
54. Vignal. Patrick. (1998). Transparency in Private Contract Law. Publications de l’Université Aix-Marseille. pp. 227–245 (In French(.
