نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار گروه حقوق دانشگاه زابل
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
This article is a comparative textual analysis of the biannual resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly on national elections from 2013 to 2023. The author argues that the concepts and phrases included in the text of the resolutions, have been increasingly and significantly strengthened. Based on this important objective fact, and also based on the practices of states during the drafting and adoption of the resolution texts, it concludes that states’ perceptions of the General Assembly resolutions goes far beyond considering them as non-binding recommendations. The author has used the research data to support the argument that General Assembly resolutions, by legitimizing some ideas and practices, can promote the acceptance of democratic standards by states. in this way, they serve as an effective tool for the advancement of United Nations human rights goals and principles. This article is a comparative textual analysis of the biannual resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly on national elections from 2013 to 2023. The author argues that the concepts and phrases included in the text of the resolutions, have been increasingly and significantly strengthened. Based on this important objective fact, and also based on the practices of states during the drafting and adoption of the resolution texts, it concludes that states’ perceptions of the General Assembly resolutions goes far beyond considering them as non-binding recommendations. The author has used the research data to support the argument that General Assembly resolutions, by legitimizing some ideas and practices, can promote the acceptance of democratic standards by states. in this way, they serve as an effective tool for the advancement of United Nations human rights goals and principles.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)