امکان‌سنجی تعریف دفاع شستشوی مغزی با نگرشی بر نظام کامن‌لا

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه حقوق، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران‏

چکیده

شستشوی مغزی، اصطلاحی است که نخستین بار برای توصیف تغییر کردار عجیب سربازانی که از جنگ بازمی‌گشتند به‌کار گرفته شد و به‌سرعت به سوژه‌ای جذاب برای داستان‌های علمی- تخیلی مبدل گشت. با این حال، طرح برخی دعاوی نشان داد که امکان چنین تغییر منش عجیبی وجود دارد. یافته‌های عصب‌شناسی و روان‌شناسی در آزمایش‌هایی همچون میلگرام و زندان استنفورد، طرح ایدۀ شخصیت سلطه‌جو و طرح‌وارۀ مخرب اطاعت و درنهایت گنجاندن مفهوم شستشوی مغزی در راهنمای آماری و تشخیصی اختلال‌های روانی با عنوان اختلال هویت‌پریشیِ دسته‌بندی‌نشده، وجود این پدیده را از نظر علمی تأیید کردند. در این راستا، حقوق‌دانان نیز طرح‌های دفاع مستقلی را با عنوان‌های «شستشوی مغزی، پیش‌زمینۀ اجتماعی فاسد، و متقاعدسازی اجباری» پیشنهاد داده‌اند؛ با اینکه دفاع پیشنهادیِ شستشوی مغزی از سوی دلگادو با انتقادات فراوانی از سوی درسلر مواجه شد، درنهایت تفسیر قانون جزای نمونه دفاع متقاعدسازی اجباری را با عنوان اکراه موقعیتی پذیرفت. در حقوق ایران، گرچه دفاعی با نام شستشوی مغزی وجود ندارد با عناوین عامی مانند سببیت اقوی، اکراه، جنون و امر آمر قانونی ارتباط نزدیکی دارد و به‌عنوان یک دفاع خاص در مواد 596 و 500 مکرر کتاب تعزیرات ق.م.ا قابل طرح است. با این حال، هیچ‌یک از این مواد عام یا خاص به قصد تعریف شستشوی مغزی وضع نشده‌اند و استناد به آنها برای رفع مسئولیت کیفریِ کسی که شستشوی مغزی شده است با ایراداتی مواجه خواهد بود.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Plausibility of defining Brainwashing Defense with an attitude ‎towards Common Law

نویسنده [English]

  • Mehri Barzegar
Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Brainwashing, a term that was first applied to describe the bizarre change in the attitude of PoWs, quickly gained popularity in science fiction stories. However, some real cases have proven that such eccentric changes in character are indeed possible. Findings in neurology and psychology, experiments like Milgram and the Stanford Prison Experiment, along with the idea of the Authoritarian Personality, the destructive schema of obedience, and finally the inclusion of the brainwashing concept in the DSM under the title of Dissociative Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (OSDD), have scientifically demonstrated this phenomenon. Accordingly, jurists have proposed independent new defenses under titles such as Brainwashing, Rotten Social Background, and Coercive Indoctrination. Even though the brainwashing defense proposed by Delgado received much criticism from Dressler, the Model Penal Code eventually accepted coercive persuasion under the title of situational duress. Although there is no formal brainwashing defense in the Iranian legal system, it is closely related to the general defenses of stronger causality, duress, insanity, and superior orders. As a specific defense, it has been addressed in Article 596 and the repeated Article 500 of the Ta’zirat section of the Islamic Penal Code. However, neither the general nor the specific provisions were intended to define brainwashing, and invoking them to excuse someone who has been brainwashed from criminal responsibility would be problematic.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Persuasion
  • ‎Defenses in Criminal Law
  • ‎Brainwashing
  • Excuses in ‎Criminal Liability
  • Mind ‎Control.‎
  1. Aaghai Nia, Hossein (2020). Crimes against Persons. 18th Tehran: Mizan (In Persian).
  2. Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Else. Sanford, Nevitt (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, USA: New York. Harper & Brothers
  3. Aghai Nia, Hossein & Rostami, Hadi (2023). Property Crimes. 3rd Tehran: Mizan (In Persian).
  4. Akefi, Laleh, Iravanian, Amir & Paknahad, Amir (2023). The Scope of Mental Disorder Defense in the Criminal Systems of Iran and the United States of America. Journal of Legal Studies. Vol 15. Issue 2. 73-110. DOI: 10.22099/jls.2023.41777.4528 (In Persian).
  5. Ardebili, Mohammad Ali (2024). General Criminal Law, 2nd 65th  Ed. Tehran: Mizan (In Persian).
  6. Caspar, E. A., Christensen, J. F., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2016). Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain. Current biology: CB, 26(5), 585–592.
  7. Chapman, Frances E. (2013). Intangible Captivity: The Potential for a New Canadian Criminal Defense of Brainwashing and Its Implications for the Battered Woman. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice. 30-76.
  8. Chitadze, Nika (2022). Global Perspectives on the Psychology of Terrorism, IGI Global
  9. Corvaglia, Luigi (2023). Cults and persuasion. Submission as preference shifting. International Journal of coercion, Abuse and Manipulation. Vol. 4. 1-22.
  10. Delgado, Richard (1978). Ascription of Criminal States of Mind: Toward a defense Theory for the Coercively Persuaded (“Brainwashed”) Defendant. Minnesota Law Review. Vol 63. 1-33.
  11. Dressler, Joshua (1979). Professor Delgado’s Brainwashing Defense: Courting a Determinist Legal System. Minnesota Law Review. 1711. 335-360.
  12. Dressler, Joshua (2015). Understanding Criminal Law. 7th USA: San Francisco. LexisNexis.
  13. Emory, Rebecca (2010). Losing Your Head in the Washer- Why the Brainwashing Defense Can Be a Complete Defense in Criminal Cases. Pace Law Review. Vol 30. Issue 4. 1337-1359.
  14. Ghari Seyed Fatemi, Seyed Mohammad (2023). Contemporary Human Rights. 1st 6th Ed. Tehran: Nashre Negah Moaser (In Persian).
  15. Habib Zadeh, Mohammad Jafar & Mirmajidi, Sepideh (2012). Self Defense in the light of Battered Women Syndrome. Contemporary Comparative Legal Studies, Vol 3. Issue 4. 117-154 (In Persian).
  16. Hamidipour, Mohsen (2021). Religious Pluralism in the Islamic Penal Code. Legal Civilization Journal. Vol 4. Issue 9. 217-236. DOI: 10.22034/lc.2022.135527 (In Persian).
  17. Horgan, John (October 2005). The Forgotten Era of Brain. Scientific American. 293 (4): 66–73
  18. https://www.independent.co.uk
  19. International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation (2020). What Are the Dissociative Disorders?
  20. Key Nia, Mehdi (2013). Basis of Criminology. 1st 14th Ed. Tehran: University of Tehran (In Persian).
  21. Livings, Ben. Reed, Alan & Wake, Nicola (2015). Mental Condition Defences and Criminal Justice System. 1st UK: Cambridge. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  22. Mirmohammad Sadeghi, Hossein (2022). General Criminal Law 2 (Criminal Responsibility). 2nd Tehran: Dadgostar (In Persian).
  23. Morgan, Robert D. (2019). The Sage Encyclopedia of Criminal Psychology. 4 Vols. USA, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  24. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (2016). DAESH RECRUITMENT. How the Group Attracts Supporters.
  25. Robinson, Paul H. (2011). Are We Responsible for Who We Are? The Challenge for Criminal Law Theory in the Defenses of Coercive Indoctrination and Rotten Social Background. Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review. Vol. 2. 53-77.
  26. Rostami, Hadi (2024). Criminal Policy Regarding Mind Control Techniques and Psychological Manipulation. Majlis & Rahbord Journal. Vol 31. Issue 119. 493-523. DOI: 10.22034/mr.2023.5555.5281 (In Persian).
  27. Saffari, Mohammadreza, Rouholamini, Mahmood & Amian, Abbas (2017). A study on cases related to Insanity Referred to Forensic Organization of Kerman Between 2012-14. Iranian Journal of Forensic Medicine. Vol 23. Issue 1. 45-51 (In Persian).
  28. Shah Hosseini, Somayeh & Tajik, Abolfazl (2017). Mechanisms of Influence and changing Lifestyles of People via New sectarianism. Spiritual Studies Journal, Vol 23. 113-138 (In Persian).
  29. Sheikol Eslami, Abbas (1395). Social Deprivations as a Justification or an excuse?. Legal Research Journal. Vol 19. Issue 75. 95-116.
  30. Taylor, Kathleen (2017). Brain Washing. 2nd USA: New York. Oxford University Press
  31. Young, Jeffrey E. Klosko, Janet S. & Weishaar, Marjorie E. (2003). Schema Therapy: A Practioner’s Guide. 1st USA: New York. Guilford Press
  32. Zolfaghari, Seyed Hasan (2000). Forty Short Iranian Stories from Forty Contemporary Authors, 1st Tehran: Nima (In Persian).