Trademark Parody: Infringing Trademark Owner’s Rights or Consistent with Freedom of Speech Principle? (Comparative Study)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Intellectual Property Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

2 LLM. Graduate, Department of Intellectual Property Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Trademark parody which has been recognized as an example of freedom of speech is a means to comment on products introduced by trademark. In this type of imitation, inspired by the original trademark, a humorous form of it is drawn in order to convey a specific message to the reader. Here, the benefits of three groups are at stake: trademark owners who enjoy exclusive rights; parodists who enjoy freedom of expression, and the public who are entitled to benefit from the results of parody. In the law of the Unites States and countries such as France and Germany, case law has played a significant role in balancing these conflicting interests. Similarity between the parodied trademark and parody and the specific effect of parody on the trademark have led trademark owners to bring infringement and dilution actions. In the Iranian law, there is no specific provision as to trademark parody. However, principle 24 the Iranian Constitution concerning freedom of expression is a suitable basis for recognizing trademark parody. In this paper, it has been suggested to provide for parody in laws as an exception to trademark owners exclusive rights and to declare its boundaries.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Adelmen, E. (2006), Trademark parodies, When is it ok to laugh? Trademark Parodies: When is it OK to Laugh?, 6 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 72. pp. 72-100.
  2. Afori, O. F. (2015), “Proportionality - a New Mega Standard in European Copyright Law”, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2500232 last visited: 1/31/2018.
  3. Ansari, B. (2008), Conditions of Protectable Work in the Literary and Artistic Properties System (Copyright), Legal Researches, n.45, pp. 97-151.  (in Persian).
  4. Badini, H., Hossein Zade, M. (2015), Study of Legal (Classic) Fair use of Descriptive Trademarks, Commercial Research, n.73, pp. 99-123. (in Persian).
  5. Bakhtiarvand, M., Aghamohammadi, A. (2016), Comparative Commercial Advertisements, Economic Law Encyclopedia, y.22, n. 8, pp. 97-123. (in Persian).
  6. Bakhtiarvand, M., Tadayon Sadi, M. (2016), a New Study on Trademark Protection in Cyberspace a Comparative Perspective, Comparative Researches, v.20, n.2, pp. 35-57. (in Persian).
  7. Basma, D. (2016), The Nature, Scope, and Limits of Modern Trademark Protection: A Luxury Fashion Industry Perspective, University of Manchester.
  8. Kemp, D. J., Forsythe, L. M.  & Jones, I. M.  (2015), Parody In Trademark Law: Dumb Starbucks Makes Trademark Law Look DUMB, 14 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 143, pp. 143-198.
  9. Duncan, S. M. (2010), Protecting Nominative Fair Use, Parody, and Other Speech-Interests by Reforming the Inconsistent Exemptions from Trademark Liability, 44 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 219, pp. 219-247. Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol44/iss1/6.last visited: 28/1/2018.
  10. Emerson, P. (2011), “I’m Litigatin’ It”: Infringement, Dilution, and Parody under the Lanham Act, 9 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 477, pp. 477-494.
  11. Fasihi Zade, A., Momeni Tezerji, E., Bagher Pour, M. (2017), A Comparative Study of the Substantive  Provisions of Trademarks with an Emphasis on Color and Three - dimensional Marks, Comparative Law Review, v.7, n.2, pp. 627-646. (in Persian).
  12. Friedmann, D. (2015), Trademarks and Social Media: Towards Algorithmic Justice Edward Elgar Publishing.
  13. Habiba, S., Hossein Zade, M. (2013), Study of Acquiring Ownership of Intellectual Property, Comparative Law Review, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 35-57. (in Persian).
  14. Habiba, S., Hossein Zade, M. (2014), Analysis of Trademark dilution Doctrine in Trademark Law System, Private Law Studies, v.43, n. 1, pp. 17-35. (in Persian).
  15. Habiba, S., Hossein Zade, M., Mohebbi Fard, S. (2017), Study of Fair use of Another’s Trademark to Introduce Goods and Services, Commercial Studies, n.78, pp. 125-147. (in Persian).
  16. Habiba, S., Mohebbi Fard, S. (2016), Fair use of Another’s Trademark in Comparative Advertising, Legal Studies, v. 7, n.4, pp. 57-91. (in Persian).
  17. Habiba, S., Mozaffari, M. (2017), Exhaustion of Rights Doctrine in Trademarks Field with a Look at Consumer Law, Private Law Studies, v.47, n.4, pp. 631-646. (in Persian).
  18. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/836/397/420255/. Last visited:2/1/2018
  19. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/648/905/1430875/.last visited:2/1/2018
  20. https://www.legalis.net/jurisprudences/cour-dappel-de-paris-13eme-chambre-section-a-arret-du-13-septembre-2005/. Last visited:2/1/2018
  21. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?idTexte=JURITEXT000007055330. Last visited: 2/1/2018.
  22. Industrial Property Protection Bill, 2016. (in Persian).
  23. Jafari, A. (2014), Legal Review of Originality Standard of Literary and Artistic Works (with Critique of Judgment of Branch 1083 of Tehran Penal General Court, Judicial Law Opinions, n.65, pp. 15-36. (in Persian).
  24. Jafari, F., Mokhtari, M. (2017), Comparative Study of the Nature of Celebrities’ Image Rights in Commercial Advertisement, Comparative Law Review, v.7, n. 2, pp. 511-532. (in Persian).
  25. Kucuk, S. U. (2016), Brand Hate navigating consumer newgativity in the ditigal world, Basingstoke, Pargrave Macmillan.
  26. Little, L. E. (2009), Regulating Funny: Humor and the Law, 94 Cornell L. Rev. pp. 1235-1292 , available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol94/iss5/9. Last visited:20/1/2018.
  27. Micallef, S. (2015), when Trademark use is not infringement, France, M anagingip.com July/ August 2015.
  28. Mir Hosseini, S. H. (2016), Trademarks Law, 2nd Edition, Tehran, Mizan. (in Persian).
  29. Pearson, A. A. (1998), Commercial Trademark Parody, The Federal Trademark Dilution Act, and the First Amendment, 32 Val. U. L. Rev.973, pp. 973-1028, Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol32/iss3/5. Last visited: 28/1/2018.
  30. Pontes, L. M. (2015), Trademark and freedom of speech: a comparison between the U.S and the EU system in the awakening of Johan Deckmyn v. Helena Vandersteen, Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ipl_ge_15/wipo_ipl_ge_15_t3.pdf. Last visited: 2/1/2018.
  31. Ramalhao, A. (2009), Parody in trademark and copyright: has humour gone too far? Cambridge Student Law Review (2009), pp. 58-74, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220049500, last visited: 1/31/2018.
  32. Robinson, D. A. (1991), A Fair Use Analysis of Trademark Parody: Cliffs Notes, Inc. v. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, 11 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 223, pp. 223-244, Available at: http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol11/iss1/10. Last visited:1/31/2018.
  33. Sauter, W. (2013), Proportionality in EU law: a balancing act? Tilburg University Discussion Paper.
  34. Shakeri, Z. (2016), Copyright  Infringement through Satire Use of Others Literary and Artistic Works, Private Law, v.13, n. 1, pp. 65-78. (in Persian).
  35. Shakeri, Z., Habiba, S. (2012), Exhaustion of Rights in Intellectual Property Law, 2nd Edition, Tehran, Samt. (in Persian).
  36. Simon, D. A. (2013),   The confusion trap: rethinking parody intrademark law, Washington Law Review, Vol. 88:1021 , pp. 1021-1101.
  37. Stim, R. (2018), Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Refer/ence, 15th Ed, Berkely, Nolo.
  38. Zarkalam, S. (2009), Literary and Artistic Law, First Edition, Tehran, Samt. (in Persian).
Comparative Law Review
Volume 9, Issue 1
Spring & Summer
April 2018
Pages 47-65

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics