A comparative study of civil responsibility of government towards users the Covid 19 vaccine in Iran and US Law .

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Iran‎

2 Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Iran, ‎Mazandaran, Iran‎

Abstract

Corona virus or Covid-19 is a disease which affected most of the countries for many year such as Iran and America and caused lots of difficulties and suffering for governments and people. Now days one of the important matters regarding the civil responsibilities of the government is transmission and spread of Corona virus among people. Due to that the aim of this project is to comparatively analysis the conditions of the civil responsibility of government towards the use of Covid-19 vaccination and methods of compensation in the Iranian and US Law system. Writer of this article tried to refer to the subject by sticking to descriptive-analytic method to explain the adaptation of the civil liability of legal system of Iran and America and find out the differences between them. Results obtained from this research show the government responsibility plan regarding this epidemic disease. It means the action or decision by the authorities can lead the responsibility of the government. Also, in US Law system to compensate the lost and damages caused by this covid-19 vaccination the compensation fund and civil responsibility insurance to compensate this case is established. And other achievements are that the government's exemption from non-judgment damages is exceptional and the main principles of the necessity require compensating unjust loss. The government can only cite it when it is sure that it has legal documentations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    1. A m. linden (1973). tort law as ombudsman, canadian bar review, vol. 51
    2. Carol harlow (1995). discretionary power and governmental liability, in: administrative discretion and problems of accountability, 25th colloquy on european law, oxford (united kingdom), council of europe publishing, 27-29 september
    3. Coco, antonio and de souza dias, talita “prevent, respond, cooperate: states’ due diligence duties vis-à-vis the covid-19 pandemic”, (may 7, 2020), journal of international humanitarian legal studies (forthcoming), available
    4. Darabpour, Mehrab, et al. (2018). Tourism Law, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library
    5. Del Waki (2010). Philosophy of Law, translator: Javad Vahedi, first edition, Tehran: Mizan Publications.
    6. Do Michel, Andre and Pi Ber Lalomire (1998). Public Law, translator: Dr. Boulfazl Ghazi, Tehran: Dadgstar Publications.
    7. Erwin chemerinsky (2001). against sovereign immunity, stanford law review, vol. 53
    8. George a.berman (1997). integrating governmental and officer tort liability, columbia law review, vol. 8
    9. graham dukes (1998). mark mildred and barbara swartz, responsibility for drug-induced injury, ios press, second edition
    10. Groutel. (2009). hubert:régimes divers. - indemnisation des victimes d'infraction: responsabilité civile et assurances
    11. Jordan, Patrice (2007). Principles of civil responsibility, translator: Adib, second edition, Tehran: Mezan Publishing.
    12. Jourdain, patrice (2008). “le recours du commettant contre son préposé pourrait être fondé sur une faute dans l'exécution du contrat de travail”. rtd civ.
    13. Lienhard, claude (1995). “pour un droit des catastrophes”. recueil dalloz
    14. Likillimba.(2009). guy-auguste “le préjudice individuel et/ou collectif en droit des groupements”. rtd com
    15. Pignerol, bernard.(2005). responsabilité et socialisation du risque»> ajda.
    16. Qureshi, ahmer a, “coronavirus & contracts: how the coronavirus may trigger force majeure”, american journal of law & medicine, vol. fe, issue 1, march y.y
    17. Renoux.(1992). thierry s. roux.andré.et delebecque. philippe. jerome pansier.frederic, op.cit.p. 9. et daligand. liliane. loriferne. dominique. raynaud. charles-andré. roche. louis.l'evaluation du dommages corporel. 3é.éd. edition alexandre lacassagne.p, et barrois. hervé "assurances terrestres
    18. Responsabilité de la puissance publique Vincent.(2009-2010). françois.responsabilité sans faute. “responsabilité civile et assurances.slim. hadi 19. responsabilité civile délictuelle en droit international privé”. jurisclasseur responsabilité civile et assurances.
    19. See.(1991). david m.o biren, constitutional law and politics: civil rights and civil liberties, vol. two, new york, w.w.norton and company, first edition
    20. Terneyre.(1993-1994). philippe.bon. pierre “la responsabilité de l'etat en cas de faute commise par des établissements de transfusion sanguine (contamination d'hémophiles par le virus du sida)”. recueil dallo. et maugüé. christine. touvet. laurent “responsabilité de la puissance publique en matière hospitalière”. ajda.
    21. U.s. v.(1995). montrose chemical corp. of california. united states court of appeals, ninth circuit. mar 21, 1995. 50 f.3d
    22. Vincent.(2010). françois “responsabilité de la puissance publique.responsabilité sans faute”. responsabilité civile et assurances
    23. Viney.(2013). geneviève, jourdain, patrice, carval, suzanne. traité de droit civil. les conditions de la responsabilité civile, 4 e. éd, librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
    24. Yazdanian, alireza .(2019). “les conditions traditionnelles de la responsabilité civile et des évolutions contemporaines: approche théorique et pratique”, thèse de -doctorat en droit privé, dans le cadre de école doctorale de droit de la sorbonne paris 1 en partenariat avec institut de recherche juridique de la sorbonne (paris) (équipe de recherche)

     

    د) فرانسوی

    1. Batbie. (1826). a.précis de cours de droit public etdministratif.3é.éd.cotillon,librairie du conseil d'état.
    2. Deguergue. (2000). maryse “responsabilit de la puissance publique. - causalité et imputabilité”. jurisclasseur responsabilité civile et assurances.
    3. Delebecque. (2008). philippe. jerome pansier.frederic. droit des obligations. 4é.éd.lexisnexis
    4. Malaurie.philippe.aynés.laurent.obligations. responsabilité délictuelle.11é.éd edition cujas.(2002). et williatte.(2009). pellitteri lina contribution à élaboration d'un droit civil des éléments aléatoires dommageables. lé.éd.l.g.d.j lextenso édition
    5. Malinvaud.philippe.(2005). droit des obligations.9é.éd.lexisnexis. litec
    6. Rajot.(2009). bénédicte “fonds de garantie divers”. responsabilité civile et assurances.
Comparative Law Review
Volume 15, Issue 1
Espring & Summer
July 2024
Pages 69-97

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics