Comparison and Rethinking the Classification of Legal ‎Systems in the Light of Socio-Cultural Commonalities and ‎Differences

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Criminal law and criminology, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of ‎Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Due to the change in the world’s legal map, the emergence of new powers, and the creation of new ideas in legal philosophy, Rene David’s famous classification which is based on Western thought, has faced serious challenges. Thus it is necessary to introduce a functionalist classification in order to describe the world’s legal map. This paper, by using library research tools and relying on the factors that construct social rules, tries to classify the existing legal paradigms based on their salient characteristics. The benefit of classifying legal systems is that such classification is based on a prior understanding of similarities and differences in legal paradigms which then makes the success or failure of legal transplantation measurable. Thus, with an emphasize on the knowledge of criminal law, this paper has classified the world’s legal systems into three paradigms: the rule of professional law, the rule of political law, and the rule of traditional law. Consequently, it would be easier to transplant national systems from each of these categories by common assumptions, and in contrast, it would be arduous to transplant legal systems under different categories.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. English

    1. Abel, R. L. (1977). Comparative law and social theory. J. Comp. L., 26, 219.
    2. Aghaei Jannat Makan, Hosein (2018), The formation of the concept of "nation state" in modern law and its impact on criminal law, abstract of the articles of the international conference on the evolution of criminal law in Islamic countries in the light of the interaction of Sharia and law, pp.38-41 (In Persian).
    3. Al-Anani, K. (2015). Upended path: The rise and fall of Egypt's Muslim brotherhood. The Middle East Journal, 69(4), 527-543.
    4. Alavi, MohammadHashem (2016), The interaction of Sharia and law in Iranian criminal law, its dimensions and developments, thesis for obtaining a master's degree, Faculty of Law, Allameh Tabatabai University (In Persian).
    5. Alavi, Mohammadhashem, (2007), examining the interaction of Sharia and law in criminal matters during the Qajar era until before the constitution, abstract of the articles of the international conference on the evolution of criminal law in Islamic countries in the light of the interaction of Sharia and law, pp. 206-209 (In Persian).
    6. Alvandi, Zahra, Kiyani, Davood (2015), "Human rights policy of the European Union towards the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia (from 2008 until now)", International Relations Studies Quarterly, No.28, pp.37-86 (In Persian).
    7. Asimi, Hamidreza, Jahanmardi, Mojgan, (2015), Islamic criminal law and the feasibility of applying the mechanisms of comparative law, abstract of the articles of the international conference on the evolution of criminal law in Islamic countries in the light of the interaction of Sharia and law, 37-86 (In Persian).
    8. Badiei Asandani, M.; Afzali, R.; Amiri, A. (2017). Explaining the political map as regards power/knowledge. Human Geography Research, 49(1), 185-202.
    9. Baker, J. (2019). Introduction to English Legal History. 5th ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    10. Bayat, Jalil,(2018), "The impact of human rights on trade relations between Iran and the European Union", Foreign Relations journal, Vol. 37, Spring, pp. 106-79 (In Persian).
    11. Buxbaum, D. C. (Ed.). (1968). Family law and customary law in Asia: a contemporary legal perspective. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    12. Cohn, M. (2004). Women, religious law and religious courts in Israel-the Jewish case. Retfaerd (Scandinavian Journal of Social Sciences), (107), 57-76.
    13. Dabashi, H. (2013). Din, Dowlat and Donya: Rethinking Worldliness. Being a Muslim in the World, 110-138). 1st ed, New York: Palgrave Pivot.
    14. Dashti Ardakani, Mohammadreza, Tajgar, Reza, (2009). "Era of united law: A Review of European Union Laws", Kanoon, No. 99, Autumn, pp. 10-39 (In Persian).
    15. Derrett, J. D. M. (1963). Introduction to modern Hindu law. 1st , London-Bombay-Calcutta: Oxford University Press.
    16. Durch, W. J.; Holt, V. K.; Earle, C. R.; Shanahan, M. K. (2003). The Brahimi report and the future of UN peace operations. Washington, DC: Stimson Center.
    17. Ellian, A., & Rijpkema, B. (2018). Militant Democracy-Political Science, Law and Philosophy. 1st, Springer International Publishing.
    18. Ewald, W. (1995). Comparative jurisprudence (II): the logic of legal transplants. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 43(4), 489-510
    19. Farnsworth, E. A. (2010). An introduction to the legal system of the United State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    20. Feirahi, Davood (2013), Jurisprudence and politics in contemporary Iran, political jurisprudence and constitutional jurisprudence, Tehran: Nei publication (In Persian).
    21. Feyz, Seyed Reza (1379). "Erfani interpretation on the two rulings of Reba’ and Zena’ by Sadr al-Din Qonavi, a Aref and thinker of the 7th century Hijri", Name Mofid, Volume 6, Number 2 (series 22), Summer, pp. 125-148 (In Persian).
    22. Funk, D. A. & Berman, Harold J. (2011). law and revolution: the formation of the Western legal tradition. Valparaiso University Law Review, 18(3), 683-703.
    23. Gholamlu, Jamshid (2017) Islamization of formal criminal law; From the theoretical basis to Iran's experience, the collection of articles of the international conference on the evolution of criminal law in Islamic countries in the light of the interaction of Sharia and law, pp. 245-230 (In Persian).
    24. Goldbach, Toby Susan (2019). Why Legal Transplants?’, Annual Reviews of Law and Social Science. 15:1,  583-601.
    25. Harasani, H. (2014). Islamic Law as a Comparable Model in Comparative Legal Research: Devising a Method. Global Journal of Comparative Law, 3(2), 186-202.
    26. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/104000/asa110212003en.pdf
    27. Husa, J. (2011). The Method Is Dead, Long Live the Methods! European Polynomial and Pluralist Methodology, Legisprudence, 5(3), 249-271.
    28. Indonesian women face harassment and bullying for not wearing Islamic headscarves, Human Rights Watch says. (2021). Available at: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/health-environment/article/3126021/indonesian-women-face-harassment-and-bullying-not
    29. Jackson, J. D. & Langer, M. (Eds.). (2008). Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska. 2008 ed, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    30. Japanese Women Campaign Against Mandatory High Heels., (2019). Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/japanese-women-campaign-against-mandatory-high-heels/
    31. Jupp, J. (2014). Legal transplants as tools for post-conflict criminal law reform: justification and evaluation. Cambridge International Law Journal, 3(2), 381-406.
    32. Kahan, A. (2004). The Mind and the Market: Capitalism in Modern European Thought. History Reviews of New Books, 32(2), 66.
    33. Katuzian, Naser (2013). "Despair of proof and the principle of innocence", Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Vol. 66, Winter, pp. 260-245 (In Persian).
    34. Krygier, M. (1990). Marxism and the Rule of Law: Reflections after the Collapse of Communism. Law & Social Inquiry, 15(4), 633-663.
    35. Lee, O. (1975). Legal and moral Systems in Asian customary law (Doctoral dissertation).
    36. Legrand, P. (1997). The impossibility of ‘legal transplants’. Maastricht journal of European and comparative law, 4(2), 111-124
    37. MalekZade, F. (2007). The Nature of Alimony: An Analysis Using the Approach of the Present Laws of Iran and Those of Some Other Countries. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 5(1), 107-125.
    38. Mattei, U. (1997). Three patterns of law: taxonomy and change in the world’s legal systems. The American journal of comparative law, 45(1), 5-44.
    39. McCorkindale, C., & Goldoni, M. (2012). Hannah Arendt and the Law. 4th, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
    40. Mehrpour, Hossein (1989). "History of Tazirat (A Perspective on the Legislation of Tazirat in the Islamic Republic of Iran)", Lawyers' Association, Vol. 148 and 149, Autumn and Winter, pp. 68-69 (In Persian).
    41. Nader, L. (1990). Harmony ideology: Justice and control in a Zapotec mountain village. 1st, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    42. Orland, L. (2002). A Russian Legal Revolution: The 2002 Criminal Procedure Code. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 18(1), 133-388.
    43. Ramseyer, J. M., & Rasmusen, E. B. (2001). Why is the Japanese conviction rate so high? The Journal of Legal Studies, 30(1), 53-88.
    44. Rawls, J. (1993). The law of peoples. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 36-68.
    45. Reimann, M., & Zimmermann, R. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    46. Rheinstein, M., & Shils, E. (Eds.). (1954). Max Weber on law in economy and society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    47. Robinson, P. H.; Zulfiqar, A.; Kammerud, M.; Orchowski, M. (2007). Codifying Shari'a: International Norms, Legality and the Freedom to Invent New Forms. Journal of Comparative Law, 2 (1(, pp. 34
    48. Robinson, Paul, (2017), Compilation of Sharia-based criminal law in Muslim-majority countries, abstract of articles of the international conference on the evolution of criminal law in Islamic countries in the light of the interaction of Sharia and law, pp. 113-113 (In Persian).
    49. Sacco, R. (1991). Legal formants: a dynamic approach to comparative law (installment II of II). The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39(2), 343-401.
    50. Saidov, A. K. (2007). Comparative Law and Law-Making. Journal of Comparative Law, pp. 56
    51. Schede, C.; Schuldt, J; Enaux, C. (2021). Federal Constitutional Court Repeals “Berlin Rent Price Cap”. Available at: https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2021/4/federal-constitutional-court-repeals-berlin-rent-price-cap
    52. Schlesinger, R. B. (1995). The past and future of comparative law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 43(3), 477-481.
    53. Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty, Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
    54. Scogin Jr, H. T. (1994). Civil law in traditional China: history and theory. Civil Law in Qing and Republican China, 13-41. Stanford, California: University of Stanford Press.
    55. Sevastik, P. (2020). Rule of Law, Human Rights and Impunity: The Case of Afghanistan. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 12(1), 93-145.
    56. Supreme Court of the United States (2021). California ET AL. v. Texas ET AL.: Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Available at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-840_6jfm.pdf
    57. Turkey to pull out of Istanbul Convention on violence against women’ (2021). Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-to-pull-out-of-istanbul-convention-on-violence-against-women/a-58114681.
    58. Vogler, R. (2017). A world view of criminal justice. 1st, UK: Routledge.
    59. Von Mehren, A. T. (1971). An Academic Tradition for Comparative Law? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 19(4), pp. 624-632.
    60. Watson, A. (1996). Aspects of reception of law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 44(2), 335-351.
    61. Watson, A. (2009). The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis Reissue with a new introduction by Barry Buzan and Richard Little. 2nd, UK: Routledge.
    62. Yari, Behboud (2003). The European Union and the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Challenge of Human Rights in the Book of Europe 2, Specially on the Relations between Iran and the European Union, Tehran: Abrar Contemporary Publishing House, Tehran (In Persian).
    63. Zweigert, K.; Kötz, H.; Weir, T. (1998). Introduction to comparative law (Vol. 3). 3rd, Oxford: Clarendon press.
Comparative Law Review
Volume 14, Issue 1
Spring & Summer 2023
July 2023
Pages 29-54

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics