Although the priority of secured rights seems absolute and inviolable, the study of new approaches of legal systems shows that the priority is also affected by economic or legal interests. In this view, by separating the effects of secured transactions into two levels of parties and others, in some special circumstances, the contract is effective only in the relationship between the parties and is considered unenforceable to others or the Hierarchy of priority is adjusted and changed by law. This article intends to explain the reasons and basics for this deviation from the rule in other legal systems and then examine the jurisprudence of Islam and some Muslim countries to examine the position of Iranian law. As a result, it is safe to say that despite the existence of some theoretical capacities in jurisprudence, the approach of Iranian law with the issue is simple and far from macro-legal measures. The subject of this article reveals another consequence of not paying attention to the validity of official documents and making it mandatory in legal relations. Therefore, the only advantage of the Secured transactions law in legal system of Iran is the ease of analysis and implementation of criteria; without special measures being taken for their efficiency.
شکری، فریده (1397). «مطالعۀ تطبیقی انعقاد عقد رهن و استقرار آن در نظام حقوقی ایران و امریکا»، فقه و حقوق خصوصی، سال اول، ش 2.
شیروی، عبدالحسین (1400). قانون مدنی چین، تهران: شهر دانش.
صفایی، حسین و جواهرکلام، محمدهادی (1399). حقوق مدنی پیشرفته، تضمینهای دین، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
طجرلو، رضا و شعبانی، هادی (1393). «وثیقۀ شناور در نظام حقوق کامنلا»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دورۀ 5، ش 1.
عیسائی تفرشی، محمد؛ نصیری، مرتضی؛ شهبازینیا، مرتضی؛ شکری، فریده (1389). «وثیقۀ شناور در نظام حقوقی ایران و امریکا»، پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی، دورۀ 14، ش 2.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1382). حقوق مدنی، عقود اذنی وثیقههای دین، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
نجفی اسفاد، مرتضی و شعبانی کندسری، هادی (1394). «تحلیل فقهی حقوقی قواعد و مقررات مربوط به رهن دریایی ایران»، مطالعات حقوقی، دورۀ 7، ش 3.
ب) عربی
ابوعقیل، توفیق (2008 م). احکام الرهن فی الشریعه الاسلامیه بین النظریه و التطبیق، رساله استکمالا درجه الماجیستر فی القضاء الشرعی، جامعه الخلیل فلسطین.
الربیعه، مبارکبن محمد (1406 ق). الرهن فی الفقه الاسلامی، رساله لنیل درجه الدکتوراه فی الفقه المقارن»، جامعه الامام محمد بن مسعود بالریاض.
الزحیلی، وهبه (1404 ق). الفقه الاسلامی و ادلته، ج 4، بیروت: دارالفکر.
السنهوری، عبدالرزاق احمد (1997 م). مصادر الحق فی الفقه الاسلامی، ج 1، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
السنهوری، عبدالرزاق احمد (2000 م). الوسیط فی شرح القانون المدنی الجدید، ج 10، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
آبی، فاضل (1417 ق). کشف الرموز فی شرح مختصر النافع، ج 1، قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
بجنوردی، سید حسن (1419 ق). القواعد الفقهیه، ج 6، قم: الهادی.
Ball, Dan (1977). ”Commercial Law Secured Transactions“, Missouri Law Review, Vol. 42, pp. 302-311.
Bourque, Jean (2010). ”Increasing Access to Credit, Reforming Secured Transactions Laws“, World Trade Organization, Work Paper, No. 69.
Coenen, Dan, Giverty, Albert (1977). ”Priority Rules of Article Nine“, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 62, pp. 834-987.
Cohen, Neil (2018). ”The Private International Law of Secured Transactions: Rules in Search of Harmonization“, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 81, pp. 203-225.
De Boeck, Pascal (2018). ”Developments of Standards for Security Interests“, IMF Legal Department, Work Paper, No. 105.
De Gruyter, Recht (2008). The Future of Secured Credit in Europe, National Academy Press.
Gullifer, Louise (2008). Good on Legal Problems of Credit and Security, Sweet & Maxwell.
Harris, Steven (2016). ”Making Senses of U.C.C. Section 9-332 (b)“, Chicago College of Law Review, Vol. 17, pp. 20-58.
Harris, Steven, Mooney, Charles (1994). ”A Property Based Theory of Security Interests: Taking Debtors Choices Seriously“, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 80, pp. 2020-2072.
Herman, Ira (2016). Security Interests and Liens Property, Lexis Practice.
Kozolchyk, Boris, Wilson, John (2002). ”The Organization of American States Model Inter-American Law on Secured Transactions“, National law Center for Inter-American Free Trade, Work paper No. 251.
Lee, Dallas (2019). ”Perfection and Priorities under the Uniform Commercial Code“, Wyoming Law Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 1-49.
Plank, Thomas (2013). ”Article 9 of the U.C.C.: Reconciling Fundamental Property Principles and Plain Language“, The Business Lawyer Journal. Vol. 68, pp. 439-506.
Rowley, Keith (2011). Secured Transactions, University of Nevada Los Vegas Press.
Segal, Nick (2007). ”The Effect of Reorganization Proceedings on Security Interests: The Position under English and U.S. Law“, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, pp. 927- 981.
Sheehan, Duncan (2016). ”Secured Transactions Law Reform Project“, University of Cambridge Discussion Paper, No. 36.
Sturner, Rolf (2017). ”Perfection and Priority of Security Rights“, European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 15, pp. 166-173.
UNCITRAl (2007). UNCITRAl Legislative Guide on Secured transactions.
Walker, Howard (2002). ”Security Interests in Accounts Receivables and Inventory in Common Law and Civil Law Jurisdictions“, Banking & Financial Institutions Groups Newsletter, Vol. 3, pp. 8-20.
Whaley, Douglas, MCJohn, Stephen (2010). Problems and Materials on Secured Transactions, Aspen Publishers.
Wood, Roderick (2010). ”Circular Priorities in Secured Transactions Law“, Alberta Law Review, Vol. 47, pp. 823-852.
Vakili Moghadam, M. H. (2022). Explaining the Challenge of Efficiency and Convenience in a Comparative Study of the Principles and criteria for Determining the Priority of Security Interests. Comparative Law Review, 13(2), 867-885. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2022.339485.634317
MLA
Mohammad Hosein Vakili Moghadam. "Explaining the Challenge of Efficiency and Convenience in a Comparative Study of the Principles and criteria for Determining the Priority of Security Interests", Comparative Law Review, 13, 2, 2022, 867-885. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2022.339485.634317
HARVARD
Vakili Moghadam, M. H. (2022). 'Explaining the Challenge of Efficiency and Convenience in a Comparative Study of the Principles and criteria for Determining the Priority of Security Interests', Comparative Law Review, 13(2), pp. 867-885. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2022.339485.634317
VANCOUVER
Vakili Moghadam, M. H. Explaining the Challenge of Efficiency and Convenience in a Comparative Study of the Principles and criteria for Determining the Priority of Security Interests. Comparative Law Review, 2022; 13(2): 867-885. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2022.339485.634317