A Comparative Survey on the International and Domestic Approaches towards Arbitration with Non-Responding Defendant

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jcl.2022.339402.634316

Abstract

Arbitration is a contractual arrangement of dispute settlement. The core of arbitration as a mechanism is 'agreement' of the disputing parties. As opined by some scholars, the backbone of any procedure for dispute settlement, including arbitration, is cooperation of opposing parties. The state courts are empowered to enforce the parties' cooperation through conduct of default process in case of respondent non-participation. However, once arbitration is concerned, parties' cooperation is more important because the tribunal conduct the arbitration based on the powers conferred thereto by the parties. If one of the parties, specifically for the purpose of this article 'the respondent', decides to not participate in arbitration due to any reason, which is not ultimately considered as justified excuse, the arbitral tribunal would face with two important conflicting questions. 1) How to respect the respondent's right of due process. 2) How and to what extent the respondent's arbitrary decision not to participate affects the claimant's contractual right of access to justice. Both courts of recognition and enforcement and annulment review of a default arbitral award encounter with a number of requirements in their course of proceeding as well. 

Keywords

References

  1. الف) فارسی

    1. آذربایجانی، علیرضا و سماواتی‏پور، محمدرضا (1393). تبیین جایگاه اصول و تشریفات دادرسی در داوری. حقوق خصوصی. 11(2). پاییز و زمستان.
    2. جنیدی، لعیا (1397). اجرای آراء داوری بازرگانی خارجی. چاپ چهارم. تهران: شهردانش.
    3. جنیدی، لعیا؛ شهبازی‏نیا، مرتضی؛ زمانی، سارا (1397). استانداردسازی منعطف در اداره‏ی دلایل در داوری‏ تجاری بین‏المللی. پژوهش‏های حقوق تطبیقی. 22(2).
    4. جنیدی، لعیا (1378). نقد و بررسی تطبیقی قانون داوری تجاری بین‏المللی مصوب 1376. تهران: انتشارات دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران.
    5. عبدالله شمس (1384). آیین دادرسی مدنی. جلد سوم. تهران: دراک.
    6. محبی، محسن و جعفری ندوشن، شهاب (1394). نظام‏های تفتیشی و اتهامی در داوری‏های تجاری بین‏المللی. مجلۀ حقوقی حقوقی بین‏المللی. ش 52، بهار و تابستان.
    7. محسنی، حسن (1394). آیین دادرسی مدنی فرانسه. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار،
    8. مصدق‏السلطنه، محمد (1396). دستور در محاکم حقوقی. به کوشش و تصحیح حسن محسنی. بازنشر، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.

     

    ب) خارجی

    1. Azarbayejani, Alireza & Samavatipour, Mohammadreza. (1393/ 2014) .A contribution to the Role of the Principles and Formalities of Judicial Proceeding in Arbitration (in Persian). Private Law. 11(2), Fall & Winter
    2. CIArb Guidelines on Party Non-Participation, available at: https://ciarb.org/media/4204/guideline-9-party-non-participation-2015.pdf
    3. CIArb Guidline on Drafting Arbitral Award, art. 1 General, available at: https://www.ciarb.org/media/4206/guideline-10-drafting-arbitral-awards-part-i-general-2016.pdf
    4. Claudia T. Salomon, Florian Loibl (2020), How to Respond to Respondent's Non-Participation in International Arbitration, A Practical Analysis for Claimants and Tribunals, American Review of International Arbitration. Vol. 30, No. 4
    5. Do Van Dai (2019). Le rôle de la volonté des parties dans les recours à l’encontre des sentences arbitrales internationales, Revue internationale de droit économique/2 (t. XXXIII), DOI: 10.3917/ride.332.0141. Available at : https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique-2019-2-page-141.htm
    6. Eric Loquin (2015). L'arbitrage du commerce international. Paris: Joly éditions.
    7. Gary B. Born (2012). International arbitration: Law and Practice, Kluwer.
    8. Gary B. Born (2020). International Commercial Arbitration. Wolters Kluwer.
    9. Gary B. Born (2014). International Commercial Arbitration. Vol. 3. 2d ed. Kluwer Law International,
    10. James Landel (2014). Le non-respect du principe de contradiction: encore un arrêt sanctionné. Éd. Législatives. Dalloz. 18 juin 2021.
    11. Jean Baptist Racine (2005).Réflexions sur les voies de recours en droit de l’arbitrage. Propos introductifs, Revue de l’arbitrage. No. 2.
    12. Joneidi Laya,Shahbazinia Morteza,Zamani Sara (2018). Flexible Standardization Of Administration Of Proof In International Commercial Arbitration. Comparative Law Researches (Modares Human Sciences). summer. Vol. 22, No. 2 (100); Page(s) 31- 56.
    13. Joneidi, Laya (1378 / 1999). A Critical and Comparative study of the Law of International Commercial Arbitration (in Persian). University of Tehran Pub.
    14. Joneidi, Laya. (1397 / 2018). The Enforcement of Foreign Commercial Arbitral Awards (in Persian). Shahr-e-Danesh Pub.
    15. Julio César Betancourt (2019). What Are the Arbitral Tribunal's Powers in Default Proceedings? Journal of International Arbitration. Issue 4, Available at:
    16. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration /36.4/JOIA2019024
    17. Laurence Craig, William Park & Jan Paulsson (2001). International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration. Oxford University Press. 3rd ed.
    18. Loic Cadiet et Jacque Normand et Soraya Amrani Mekki (2020). Theorie Generale du Proces, puf.
    19. Mark B Feldman (2021). The Annulment Proceeding and The Finality of ICSID Arbitral Awards. ICSID Review, Foreign Investment Law. Aug., Available at: https://academic.oup.com/icsidreview/article/2/1/85/652565 by guest on 10 August 2021
    20. Mohebi Mohsen, Jafari Nadoushan Shahab (2015). A Survey on Adversarial and Inquisitorial Models in International Commercial Arbitration. International Law Review. Spring & Summer.
    21. Mohsseni, Hassan (1394 / 2015). French Code of Civil Procedure (In Persian and French). Sherkat Sahami Enteshar Pub. Tehran.
    22. Mosadegh-Alsaltaneh, Mohammad (1396 / 2017). Procedural Order in Civil Courts (In Persian). Sherkat Sahami Enteshar Pub. Tehran.
    23. Shams, Abdullah (1384 / 2005). Civil Procedure (in Persian). Vol. 3. Tehran: Darak Pub.
Comparative Law Review
Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 26
Autumn & Winter 2022-2023
September 2022
Pages 675-694

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics