The Parties’ Bringing Changes in Action and Litigation (Comparative Study)

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor,Faculty of Law & Political Sciences,University of Tehran, Tehran,Iran.

Abstract

To whom belongs an action? Only complainant? Or defendant may also have his share on it? So called expression in civil procedure "action belongs to the parties" shows this practical and legal reality that each party can do some acts on civil litigation such as choosing the action and freedom in that work, transfer of action, and freedom of defense. Action becomes in some cases common things of the parties. This time called and "time of decision".  Sometimes disputing  parties can do their modification to the procedure and not to litigation. Where each party do some modification to litigation such as consenting to conciliation or arbitration or they do some modification in litigation by filling incident action. Those acts need consent or acceptation of defendant. In the other words, when each party do some modification to the litigation such as consenting to conciliation or arbitration or they do some modification in litigation by filling incident action, those acts need consent or acceptation of the defendant. It seems that this limit of ownership does not permits claimant to withdraw action in case of disagreement with the judgments.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Appeal Court of Tehran Judgments 2013, (2015), Judicairy Research Institute, (in Persian)
  2. Borojerdi Abdoh, M. (2002), Judicial Principles, Extracted from Supreme Court Judgments, Roham Edition .(in Persian)
    Borojerdi Abdoh, M. (2014), Islamic Law Resources and Principles, University of Tehran Edition. (in Persian)
  3. Cadiet, L., (2014), Code de procédure civile, Paris, Litec.
  4. Cadiet, L., et Emmanuel JEULAND, (2016), Droit judiciaire privé, Paris, Litec, 9e éd.
  5. Cornu, Gérard, (2007), Vocabulaire juridique, Paris, PUF / Quadrige, 7e éd.
  6. Ghamami, M., Mohseni, H., (2011), Transnational Civil Procedure, Enteshar Co. Publication, (in Persian)
  7. Ghamami, M., Mohseni, H., (2012), Principle of Party Autonomy in Civil Litigation & Its Exceptions, Journal of Law Quarterly, No. 1, Year 42, pp. 201-216. (in Persian)
  8. Helli, A., (1993), The Way of Islamic Law, Translated to Persian by A. Yazdi, By Essay of M. T. Daneshpajooh, Vol. 4, University of Tehran Edition. (in Persian)
  9. Jafari Langueroudi, M.J. (2002), Islamic Science Encyclopedia, Guanje Danesh Liberary, 3rd Edition .(in Persian)
  10. Jauerning, O., Burkhard HESS, (2011), Zivilprozessrecht, München, C. H. Beck.
  11. Khodabakhshi, A. (2011), Islamic Law Foundation of Civil Procedure, Enteshar Co. Publication, (in Persian)
  12. Khodabakhshi, A. (2014), Law of Civil Judgment Enforcement, Enteshar Co. Publication, (in Persian)
  13. Maraghi, M., Titles of Islamic Law, Islamic Publication Institute, vol. 2, (in Arabic)
  14. Matindaftari, A. (2000), Civil and Commercial Procedure, Majd Publication, (in Persian)
  15. Mohammadi, A., Islamic Jurisprudence, University of Tehran Edition. (in Persian)
  16. Mohseni, H. (2012), Relation between Incident Actions and Principal Actions, Dependence or not, in: Collected Cases, Editor in Chief: Professor A. Naser Katouzian, Jungle Publication, (in Persian)
  17. Mohseni, H. (2017), Counterclaim, Legal Researches, No. 73, pp. 167-198, (in Persian)
  18. Mohseni, H. (2017), Description of Judgment from the Perspective of Reviewability (Appeal), Comparative Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 323-242, (in Persian)
  19. Mohseni, Hassan, (2012), Civil Procedure of France, vol. 1, introduction by Loïc Cadiet and Abbas Karimi, Tehran, Enteshar Co,. (in Persian).
  20. Mohseni, H., (2014), Organizing of Civil Procedure, Preface by Nasser Katouzian, Enteshar Co,. (in Persian).
  21. Mohseni, H., (2015), Civil Procedure of France, vol. 2, introduction by Loïc Cadiet and Majid Ghamami, Tehran, Enteshar Co,. (in Persian).
  22. Mohseni, S., Maboudi Neishabouri, R., Moussavi Taghiabadi, S. J., The Notion of First Audience of Litigation, Legal Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 117-133. (in Persian)
  23. Shams. A. (2008), Civil Procedure, Derak Publication, Vol. 2, 20th Edition. (in Persian)
  24. Shams. A. (2008), Civil Procedure, Derak Publication, Vol. 3, 15th Edition. (in Persian)
  25. Shams. A. (2009), Civil Procedure, Derak Publication, Vol. 1, 21st Edition. (in Persian)
  26. Sngueladji, M. (2005), Adjudication in Islamic Law, University of Tehran Edition. (in Persian)
  27. Strickler, Y., (2010), ''Désistement'', in : Répertoire de procédure civile Dalloz, Paris, Dalloz.
  28. Vahedi, J., (1990), Counterclaim, Legal & Judicial Journal of Ministry of Justice, pp. 6-21 . (in Persian)

Vahedi, J., (1997), First Audience of Litigation and its Specifications, Journal of Law Quarterly, No. 1, Year 38, pp. 67-84. (in Persian)

Comparative Law Review
Volume 9, Issue 1
Spring & Summer
April 2018
Pages 403-423

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics