The Effect of Force Majeure on the Scope of Liability in Compulsory Insurance Act of 2016 Compared to Former Laws and General Rules with a Comparative Study in French Law

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Islamic Azad University, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Department of Private Law, Amol, Iran

2 PhD Student of Islamic Azad University,Sari,Mazandaran,Iran

Abstract

In tort law, Force Majeure is considered to be one of the obstacles to civil liability. Accordingly, damage caused by Force Majeure in compulsory insurance Act of 1968 was excluded from insurance coverage and law. In amending the Compulsory Insurance Act of 2008, excluding damage caused by Force Majeure of insurance coverage was removed, and the question is raised as to whether the damage caused by Force Majeure is under the purview of the law or not? In the Compulsory Insurance Act of 2016, this question becomes more important because on the one hand, this law has not mentioned about excluding damage caused by Force Majeure from the, on the other hand, any accident caused by a vehicle because of fortuitous events has placed under the law. To answer this question, we first review the concept of Force Majeure by means of conducting a comparative study in French law and then the effect of Force Majeure in compulsory insurance laws will be compared with the general rules of liability in Iranian and French law.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Aliabadi, I. (1988), Exceptions to the Law on Compulsory Insurance of Cars, Central Iranian Insurance Quarterly, Third Year, No. 1, pp. 25-28. (in Persian)
  2. Babaei, I. (2011), Insurance law, Tehran: Samt Publication. (in Persian)
  3. Badini, H. (2013), Civil Liability Philosophy, Tehran: Publication Co. (in Persian)
  4. ------------- and Sha'bani Kdesiri, H. and Radparvar, S. (2012), Pure responsibility, foundations and examples, Journal of Comparative Law Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 19-36. (in Persian)
  5. Bahrami Ahmadi, H. (2008), Analysis of the Law on Compulsory Insurance of Motor Vehicles for the Third Party, approved in 1347, and the Amendment to this Law, adopted in 2008, Islamic Research Journal, No. 3, pp. 93-118. (in Persian)
  6. Cornu, G. (1992), Vocabulaire juridique, 3e éd, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  7. Farahani, A. and Shirzad, J. and Kashfi, S. (2011), Innovations of the new law on compulsory insurance and its basis, Journal of Law Enforcement, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 161-198. (in Persian)
  8. Ghabuli Dorafshan, S.M.M. and Rezadoust, V. (2012), The role of external means in civil liability due to accidents involving the driving of motor vehicles based on the latest legislative developments (comparative study of Iranian and French law), Comparative Law Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 93-110. (in Persian)
  9. Haji Azizi, B. and Gholami, N. (2013), The Position of the Assumption in Civil Responsibility, Journal of Comparative Law Research, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 25-45. (in Persian)
  10. Imami, S.H. (2003), Civil Rights, Vol. 1, Tehran: Islamiyah Publications. (in Persian)
  11. Isanlou, M. (2008), Review and analysis of the law of compulsory insurance, Quarterly Journal of Law, Volume 38, No. 4, pp. 37-56. (in Persian)
  12. Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (2002), Expanded in the Terminology of Law, Vol. 3 and 4, Tehran: Ganj Danesh. (in Persian)
  13. Katouzin, N. (2011), Non-contractual Obligations; Civil Liability, Vol. 1, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (in Persian)
  14. ---------------- (2012), Non-contractual Obligations; Civil liability, Volume 2, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (in Persian)
  15. ---------------- (2004), Introductory Civil Law Period; Legal Acts, Tehran: Public Joint Stock Company. (in Persian)
  16. ---------------- (2010), Introductory Civil Law Course; Legal Events, Tehran: Public Joint Stock Company. (in Persian)
  17. ----------------- (2011), Productivity Responsibility, Tehran: Tehran University Press.
  18. Khadem Razavi, Q. and Noee, E. and Mehpouyan, A. (2015), The relationship between causality in responsibility due to recklessness; A comparative look at civil and civil rights in Iran and England, Private Law Research, Third Year, No. 10, pp. 43-65. (in Persian)
  19. Khodabakhshi, A. (2011), Civil liability arising from driving accidents and its developments in Iranian law, Journal of Legal Justice, No. 74, pp. 103-128. (in Persian)
  20. Larroumet, C. (2007), Droit Civil, T. III, les obligations, le contrat, 2e partie, effets, 6e éd., Paris: Economica.
  21. Le Tourneau, P. (2012), Droit de la Responsabilite et des contrats, Regime d'indemnisation, Paris: Dalloz
  22. Maboudi Neishabouri, R. and Haddad Khodaparast, Ma. (2014), The Civil Criminal Principle of Owners of Motor Vehicle Land Based on the New Compulsory Insurance Act, Journal of Insurance, No. 1, pp. 181-200. (in Persian)
  23. Malaurie, Ph., Aynès, L. et Stoffel-Munck, Ph. (2009), Droit Civil, les obligations, Paris: Defrénois, Lextenso editions, 4th ed
  24. Marty, G. and Raynaud, P. (1988), Droit Civil, les obligations, 2 ed. Vol. 1, Paris: Sirey.
  25. Nazari, I. (2002), Civil liability of accidents caused by accidents, Journal of Neda Sadegh, No. 26 and 27, pp. 111-130. (in Persian)
  26. Nikbakht, H (1997), Effects of Force Majeure and Exit of the Contract, International Law Magazine, No. 21, pp. 95-144. (in Persian)
  27. Qasimzadeh, S.M. (2011), Civil Negotiation Requirements and Contracts, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
  28. Rahpeik, H. (2011), Civil Liability and Compensation Rights, Tehran: Khorsandi Publishing. (in Persian)
  29. Rahpeik, S. (2011), Civil liability of vehicle owners in accordance with the mandatory insurance law of 1387 compared to the law approved in 1347, Quarterly Journal of Law, Vol.41, No. 3, pp. 171-183. (in Persian)
  30. Salehi Janali, M. (1993), Rights of Losses and Third Party Insurance, Tehran: Tehran University Press, 1993. (in Persian)
  31. Safaii, S.H. (2003), Introductory Civil Law Course; General Rules of Contracts, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
  32. ------------- (1985), Force Majeure, International Law Magazine, No. 3, pp. 111-179. (in Persian)
  33. ------------- (1996), Collection of Civil Rights and Comparative Laws, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
  34. ------------- and Rahimi, H. (2010), Civil liability; Non-contractual requirements, Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
  35. Tahmasbi, J. (2009), Discourse on the Amending the Compulsory Insurance Act of 2008, Journal of Legal Justice, No. 68, pp. 31-63. (in Persian)
  36. Tancelin, Maurice (1997), Des obligations actes ET responsabilités, Montréal Wilson & Lafleur, 6th ed.
  37. Terré, François & Similer, Philippe & Lequette (2005), Yves, Droit civil; les obligations, 9e éd., paris: Dalloz.
  38. van Gerven, Walter  & Lever, Jeremy  & Larouche, Pierre &  Von Bar, Christian & Viney, Geneviève (2000), Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Tort Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  39. Viney, Geneviève et jourdain, Patrice (1998), Les conditions de la resposabilité civile, The Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 2th ed.
  40. Yazdanian, A. (2007), Civil Rights; Civil Code of Civil Responsibility, Vol. 1, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
  41. Yearbook of the International Law Commission (1978), Force majeure and fortuitous event as circumstances precluding wrongfulness: survey of State practice, international judicial decisions and doctrine Study, prepared by the Secretariat, vol. II, Part One.
Comparative Law Review
Volume 9, Issue 1
Spring & Summer
April 2018
Pages 309-329

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics