The Application of the Theory of Voluntary Assumption of Risk in Athletes’ Civil Liability: A Comparative Study in English, French and Iranian law

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of the department of private law in the faculty of law and political science of Allameh Taba taba’i University,Tehran,Iran.

2 L.L.M in private law at the faculty of law and political science of Allameh Taba taba’i University,Tehran,Iran.

Abstract

The theory of voluntary assumption of risk is an often-quoted form of the roman legal maxim and it fully exonerates the defendant .The essential elements of the defence of volenti are the explicit or implicit consent of the victim to waive all claims for damages and also the fully awareness of the victim of all the risks involved, including both the nature and the extent of the risk. The theory has specific features in French sport cases and it is considered as a victim’s consent and a ‘’fait justificatif spécial’’. In this matter, a reform has occurred in French sport law recently. English and French jurists have different perspectives on the effect of this theory. In this paper we will specify comparatively the nature, theoretical basis, essential conditions and legal effect of volenti in sport cases (its main domain of application) by referring to relevant doctrines, codes and precedent in English and French civil liability. Then we will compare their results with the effect of similar legal institution in Iranian sports law.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Achrash, Nasser (2011), The Effect of assumption of risk in seeking compensation: A comparative study of French and common law, PhD thesis in Tehran University. (in Persian)
  2. Amili, Zayn al-Din, Shahid Thani (1989), Al-Rawḍa al-bahīyya fī sharḥ al-lūmʿat al-dīmashqīyya, Vol. 4, First Edition, Qom: Davari Bookstore. (in Arabic)
  3. Amili, Zayn al-Din, Shahid Thani (2004), Masalik al-afham, Vol. 15, Third Edition, Qom: Maaref Al-Eslamiyah (in Arabic)
  4. Awdah, Abd al-Qādir, Al-tashri' al-jina'i al-islami, Vol. 1, Beirut: Dar al-kotob al-arabi. (in Arabic)
  5. Campguilhem, R. (1961), La notion d'acceptation des risques sportifs et le droit de la responsabilité civile, Thèse, Paris.
  6. Demogue, R. (1925), Traité Des Obligations En Général,  Tome 5, Paris : L. Arthur Rousseau.
  7. Durand Paul J. (1931), Des conventions d’irresponsabilites, Thèse, Paris.
  8. Esmein, P. (1952), ‘’L’idée D’acceptation Des Risques En Matière De Responsabilité Civile’’, Revue Internationale De Droit Comparé, Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp.683-691.
  9. Ghabouli Dor afshan. Mohammad Mahdi; Reza doust, Vahid (2012), ‘’The Function of External Causes (Causes Étrangères) in Civil Liability of Car Accidents According to Recent Reforms: A Comparative Study of French and Iranian law’’, Comparative Law Review, Vol.3, No.1, pp. 93-110.
  10. Gerard, Emmanuel (Avril 2014), ‘’La Notion Du Risque Accepté’’, Subaqua,Rubrique Juridique,  N˚ 253, pp. 80-81.
  11. Groutel H. (1999), ‘’L'acceptation des risques: dérapage ou décollage?’’, Responsabilité civile et assurances, Editions du jurisclasseur, juillet-août 1999, Chron. N°16, spec.
  12. Hocquet-Berge, S. (Février2011), ‘’L’acceptation  Des Risques En Matière Sportive Enfin Abandonnée’’, Revue Mensuelle Lexisnexis  Jurisclasseur, N°2, Étude 3,  http://laboratoire-droit-sport.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Acceptation-des-risques-abandonn%C3%A9e-F%C3%A9vrier-2011.pdf, 16/4/2018.
  13. Honorat J. (1969), L’idée d’acceptation des risques dans la responsabilité civile, Paris : Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
  14. osseini Maraghi, Mir abdul Fattah (1997), Alanavin, Vol. 1& 2, Qom: Institute for Islamic. (in Arabic)
  15. Jafari Langeroudi, Jafar (2001), The Philosophy of civil law, Tehran: Ganje Danesh. (in Persian)
  16. James, Mark (2013), Sports Law, Second Edition, Palgrave Macmillan Law Masters, UK.
  17. James, Mark (2006),’’ Liability for professional athletes injuries: a comparative analysis of where the risk lies’’, Web journal of current legal issues, http://usir.salford.ac.uk/1058/1/james1.pdf, 16/4/2018.
  18. Jourdain, Patrice (2007), Les Principes De La Responsabilité Civile, 7e Édition, Traduit par Majid Adib en persan, Téhéran : Éditions Mizan. ( in Persian)
  19. Katouzian, Nasser (2006), Extra-contractual obligations, Vol. 1&2, Fifth Edition, Tehran University. (in Persian)
  20. Katouzian, Nasser (1999), ‘’Sport Negligence and Sport Liability’’, Journal of Tehran University, N ̊ 43, pp. 37-57. (in Persian)
  21. Kulaynī, Muhammad ibn Ya'qub (1988), Al-Kafi, Vol. 7, Third Edition, Tehran: Dar al-kotob al-islami. (in Arabic)
  22. Lozach, Jean-Jacques (2012), Rapports législatifs , Rapport n˚372, https://www.senat.fr/rap/l11-372/l11-372.html, 16/4/2018.
  23. Makarem Shirazi, Nasser (1989), Al-Qawaidul Fiqhiyyah, Vol. 1 & 2, Second Edition, Qom: Madreseh Imam Amir Al-Momenin. (in Arabic)
  24. Mawsuat al-fiqh al-islami al-mogharen, (1966), Vol. 3. Cairo, Al-Majlis al-ala lelshoun al-islami. (in Arabic)
  25. Megdadi, Mohammad Mehdi (2014), ‘’The Effect of Assumption of Risk (Eqdam) in exonerating the civil liability of sport athletes’’, The Journal of Comparative Law of Mofid University, N ̊ 102, pp. 133-150. (in Persian)
  26. Mohaghegh Karaki , A.H. (1993), Jame Al Maghased Fi Sharh Al Ghavaed, Vol. 6, Second Edition, Qom: Institute Of Ahl-E-Bayt. (in Arabic)
  27. Momen Qomi, Mohammad (1994), kalamate Sadide, First Edition, Qom: Islami publication. (in Arabic)
  28. Najafi, Mohammad Hassan (1983), Jawahir al-kalam, Vol. 43 & 42, Seventh Edition, Beirut: Dar Ihya'al-Turath al-Arabi. (in Arabic)
  29. Pilloix , Arnaud (2013), ‘’Théorie De L’acceptation Des Risques :État Des Lieux’’, https://www.ellipse-avocats.com/2013/02/theorie-de-lacceptation-des-risques-etat-des-lieux/,16/4/2018.
  30. Rashid Samiri, Mufleh Bin Hassan (1999), Ghayat al-Maram -fi sharh shara'i' al-islam., Vol.2, First Edition, Beirut: Dar al-Hadi. (in Arabic)
  31. Ruiz, Romain )2013(, L'acceptation Des Risques Dans La Pratique Sportive, M2, Université Paris Sud 11, Faculté Jean Monnet.
  32. Safai, Hossein; Rahimi, Habibollah, (2010), Civil Liability (Extra-Contractual Obligations), Tehran: Samt publication. (in Persian)
  33. Sweep, F.F.C.C. (2015), Volenti non fit injuria?How Does Consent Influence the Perception of the Ideal Victim, Master Thesis Faculty of Law Tilburg University.
  34. Tabatabai Yazdi, Mohammad Kazem (1999), Hashie Al Makaseb, Vol.1, Qom: Ismailian. (in Arabic)
  35. Tunc , A et Mazeaud, L. et H. (1960), Traité théorique et pratique de la responsabilité civile délictuelle et contractuelle, T.2. N˚, 1485 Et S ; T1, N˚151, Paris : Montchrestien.
  36. Ulpien, Domitius, Digeste(Pandectes), Livre 47, Titre 10, Paragraphe 5.
  37. Van Gerven, W. (2000), Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Tort Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  38. Viney, G. et P. Jourdain (2006),Les conditions de la responsabilité, 3ème Édition, Paris.
  39. Yazdanian, Alireza; Mahdavi Seyyed Mohammad Hadi; Abbasian Reza; Mosallanezhad Niusha (Spring & Summer2016), ‘’A comparative study of objects realms in the civil liability resulting from objects at Iranian and French Laws’’, Comparative Law Review, Vol.7, No.1, pp 367-383.
Comparative Law Review
Volume 9, Issue 1
Spring & Summer
April 2018
Pages 147-178

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics