The Nature of the Lex Mercatoria

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant professor in Institute for Management and Planning Studies,Tehran,Iran.

Abstract

The theory of lex mercatoria shall be known as a theory in the frontier of the law science. The theory of lex mercatoria is an autonomous doctrine which is not enforced by sovereign governments but is created by active merchants in the field of international commerce and applied through international commercial arbitration. This subject is in contradiction to the paradigms of the present time regarding the foundation of law and its resources. Nevertheless, the Lex Mercatoria principle can be applied by arbitrators as a practical instrument. since the Lex Mercatoria is a new theory, the jurists have had different ideas regarding its nature and meaning.: Some believe that it is a method of finding the appropriate law, some other recognize it as a collection of general principles and legal rules. However, the most controversial ideas belong to those who deem the Lex Mercatoria a legal system beside the national and international public law.

Keywords


1-         Amselek, P./Grzegorczyk, C. (eds), (1989), Controverses autour de l'ontologie du droit, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
2-         Arnaud A.-J., (1988), Dictionnaire encyclopédique de théorie et de sociologie juridique, Paris: L.G.D.J.
3-         Austin, J., (1998), The Province of Jurisprudence Determined [1832], Indianapolis, Hackett.
4-         Bhala, R., (1999), “The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law” (Part One of a Trilogy), in: American University International Law Review, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp. 845-956.
5-         Berman H.J./Dasser F., (1998), The «New» Law Merchant and the «Old»: Sources, Content, and Legitimacy, in: CARBONNEAU T. (ed), Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration: A Discussion of the New Law Merchant, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
6-         Bohannan, P., (1965), “The Differing Realms of the Law”, in: American Anthropologist, volume 67, issue 6, pp. 33-42.
7-         Bucher, A./Tschanz P.-Y., (1988), International Arbitration in Switzerland, Basle, Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
8-         Canivet, G./Andenas, M./Fairgrieve, D. (eds), (2004), Comparative Law Before the Courts, London, BIICL.
9-         Carbonneau T., (2004), “Arbitral Law-Making”, in: Michigan Journal of International Law, Volume 25, issue 4, pp. 1183-1206.
10-      Chevallier. J., (1983), “L'ordre juridique”, in: Le droit en procès, Paris, P.U.F (Presses universitaires de France), pp. 7-49
11-      Coleman, J., (2001), Hart’s Postscript, Oxford University Press, 2ed edition.
12-      Dabin, J., (1969), Théorie général du droit, Paris, Dalloz.
13-      Dehdar, Farzin, (2013), The Foundation and The Sources of Lex Mercatoria, the theses submitted for the degree of PhD, under supervision of Dr. Farhad Iranpour, Faculty of law and political science, Tehran university. (in Persian)
14-      Delaume, G., (1989), “Comparative Analysis as a Basis of Law in State Contracts”: The Myth of the Lex Mercatoria, in: Tulane Law Review, Volume 63, pp. 575-610
15-      De Sousa Santos B., (2002), Toward a New Legal Common Sense, London, Butterworths. 2nd ed.
16-      Gaillard, Emmanuel, (2001), “Transnational Law: A Legal System or a Method of Decision-Making?” LCIA, Arbitration International, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 59-71
17-      Gaillard, Emmanuel, (1996), Efficient Arbitration Proceedings/The Law Applicable in International Arbitration, ICCA Congress Series No. 7, (Vienna 1994), van den Berg (ed), Netherlands, Kluwer Law International.
18-      Goldman, B., (1964), “Frontières du Droit et Lex Mercatoria”, Archives de Philosophie du Droit, volume 9, pp. 177-192.
19-      Gray, C./Kingsbury, B., (1992), “Developments in Dispute Settlement: Inter-State Arbitration Since 1945”, in: British Year Book of International Law, Volume 63, issue 1, pp. 97-134
20-      Hart, H.L.A., (1994), The Concept of Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed,
21-      Kahn, P., (1975), “Lex mercatoria et pratique des contrats internationaux: l'expérience française”, in: Le contrat économique international, Brussels, p. 200 et seq
22-      Kaufmann-Kohler, G., (2007), “Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity, or Excuse?”, in: Arbitration International, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. 357-378
23-      Kant, I., (1996),The Metaphysics of Morals [1797], Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
24-      Kelsen, H., (1967), Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley, California, University of California Press.
25-      Kelsen, Hans, 1961, General theory of law and state, Anders Wedberg trans., New York: Russell & Russell, 2ed edition.
26-      Kramer, M.H., (1999), In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings, New York, Oxford University Press.
27-      Kramer, M.H., (2007), Objectivity and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
28-      Kramer, M.H., (2005), “Of Final Things: Morality as One of The Ultimate Determinants of Legal Validity”, in: Law and Philosophy, Volume 24, pp. 47-97.
29-      Locke J., (1986), The Second Treatise on Civil Government, New York, Buffalo.
30-      Lagarde, P., (1982), “Approche critique de la lex mercatoria”, in: Le droit des relations économiques international, Etude offerte à Berthold Goldman, Paris, Litec, pp. 125-150
31-      Lando, Ole, (1985), “The Lex Mercatoria in International Arbitration”, INT`L & COMP.L.Q., Volume 34, issue 4, pp. 747-768
32-      Larroumet, C., (2006), “A propos de la jurisprudence arbitrale”, Gazette du Palais, No 348, pp. 5-32
33-      Loquin, E., (1989), “La réalité des usages du commerce international”, RIDéco, Paris, at pp. 163-194
34-      Lowenfeld, A., (1990), “Lex mercatoria: an arbitrator`s view”, Arbitration International, The Official Journal of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), Volume 6 London, pp. 133-150
35-      Marmor, A., (2001), Positive Law & Objective Values, Oxford, England.
36-      Mustill, M., (1988), “The New Lex Mercatoria: The First Twenty-Five Years”, in: Arbitration International, pp. 86-119
37-      Oppetit, B., (1982), “La notion de source du droit et le droit du commerce international”, in: Archives de philosophie du droit, Tome 27, pp. 43-53.
38-      Oppetit, B., (1992), “Le droit international privé, droit savant”, in: Hague Lectures. Volume 234, pp. 331-434.
39-      Ost F./Van De Kerchove M., (2002), De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit, Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, Bruxelles.
40-      Pellet A., (2000) “La lex mercatoria, tiers ordre juridique? Remarques ingénues d’un internationaliste de droit public”, in: Souveraineté étatique et marchés internationaux à la fin du 20e siècle: mélanges en l’honneur de Philippe Kahn, Paris, pp. 53-74.
41-      Perrin, J.-F., (1997), Sociologie empirique du droit, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Basle.
42-      Pospisil l.J., (1971), Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory, Harper & Row New York.
43-      Poudret J.-F./Besson S. (2007), Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2nd edn, London.
44-      Pradelle G., (2003), La justice privée, in : GHERARI, H./SZUREK S. (eds), L’émergence de la société civile internationale : vers la privatisation du droit international ? Paris.
45-      Rawls, J., (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.
46-      Rigaux, F., (1989), Les situations juridiques individuelles dans un système de relativité générale, Cours général de droit international privé, in Recueil des cours de l'Académie de droit international de la Haye, Leiden, Sijthoff, pp. 9–407.
47-      Romano, S., (1975), L'ordre juridique, Paris, Dalloz.
48-      Teubner, G., (1988), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
49-      Von Ihering, R., (1913), Law as a Means to an End [1877–83], Boston, The Boston Book Company.
50-      Weber, M., (1978), Economy and Society [1925], Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.