Distinction between properties of public entities in French Law

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor in Faculty of Law in Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD candidate in Public Law, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In the French Law, the properties of public entities and at the head of them, the properties of state are divided into public domain of public entities and private domain of public entities. The criterion of distinguishing of public properties of public entities is a procedural matter that has been taken from French Doctrine, however the recent law of public entities ownership passed in 2006 has arrived these criteria in the legal texts. There principles of public ownership, and use and preparation enter a property into public properties of public entities. The state is in the top position in these properties, so the governing rules of them are administrative and their competent courts are administrative courts. But in the case of private domain of public entities, the administration is equal with ordinary persons; therefore the rules of private law and judicial courts govern it.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. الف) فارسی:

    1. امامی، م و استوار سنگری،ک (1388)، حقوق اداری، تهران: میزان.
    2. مؤتمنی،، م ط، (1390)، حقوق اداری، تهران: سمت.

     

    ب) خارجی:

    Dauphin (mai 11, 1959).

    le Béton ( octobr 19, 1956).

    soc ( février 5, 1965).

    Bergel, J. l. (2000). Traite de Droit civil. paris: LGDJ.

    Berthélemy, H. (1933). Traitéélémentaire de droit administratif. Paris: A. Rousseau.

    Berthier (CE Avril 23, 1960).

    Binczak, P. (2000). Droit administratif des bien. paris: Gaullino.

    Boulier (janvier 24, 1990).

    Chapus, R. (2001). Droit administratif général (جلد 2). paris: Montchrestien.

    chevalier, J. (2012). Service publique. Paris: PUF.

    Cie d'assurances la Préservatrice foncière (CE février 11, 1994).

    Code du domaine de l'Etat (1957).

    Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques. (2006).

    Debbasch, C. (1999). Droit administratif des biens. Paris: PUF.

    dictionnaire le Robert. (2001). paris.

    Douence, M. (2006). L'inaliénabilité du domaine public. AJDA , ص. 238.

    Dufau, J. (2012). Propriété publique et domanialité publique. AJDA , ص. 1381.

    Févrot, O. (2012). Définition du domaine public et dualisme juridictionnel. AJDA , ص. 841.

    Gaudemet, Y. (2002). Droit administratif des biens. Paris: L.G.D.J.

    Gaudemet, Y. (2014). Traite de Droit Aministratif. Paris: L.G.D.J.

    Gozzoli (CE 1975).

    Guettier, C. (2008). Droit administratif des biens . Paris: PUF.

    Laget-Annamayer, A. (2003). Occupation du domaine public et intérêt général. AJDA , ص. 1201.

    Mansuy (CE mars 21, 1984).

    Marécar (CE juin 1935).

    Rozet, C. B. (2007). L’amenagement indispensable un critere discutable . AJDA , ص. 571.

    Tifine, P. (2012). Droit administratif français. paris: Éditions juridiques franco-allemandes.

    Yolka, P. (1997). La propriétépublique. Paris: LGDJ.

Comparative Law Review
Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
Autumn & Winter
October 2014
Pages 317-333

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics