Detention has been taken into staff consideration as a restrictive action since a long time ago. Besides quite a few multiple documents are issued in connection with freedom support against detention by human rights defenders and international organization.
Since illustration of these documents practically display, digging in method of international penal courts such as permanent and temporary regarding to this issue could point to benefit amount in courts from these documents.
Also survey of the civil rights in detention as providing criminal could express this issue that how much is benefit amount of the civil rights from human rights documents and clarify legislative policy approach of the civil rights regarding to inclination to documents or to rules or procedure of international criminal courts. therefore examination of these issues can suitably assist with energizing the civil rights.
Tahmasebi, J., & Golriz, A. (2012). Comparative Survey Of Detention In Constitution And Judgment Rules Of Procedure Of In Criminal Courts Based On Human Rights And Civil Rights. Comparative Law Review, 3(2), 83-100. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2012.32113
MLA
Javad Tahmasebi; Amin Golriz. "Comparative Survey Of Detention In Constitution And Judgment Rules Of Procedure Of In Criminal Courts Based On Human Rights And Civil Rights", Comparative Law Review, 3, 2, 2012, 83-100. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2012.32113
HARVARD
Tahmasebi, J., Golriz, A. (2012). 'Comparative Survey Of Detention In Constitution And Judgment Rules Of Procedure Of In Criminal Courts Based On Human Rights And Civil Rights', Comparative Law Review, 3(2), pp. 83-100. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2012.32113
VANCOUVER
Tahmasebi, J., Golriz, A. Comparative Survey Of Detention In Constitution And Judgment Rules Of Procedure Of In Criminal Courts Based On Human Rights And Civil Rights. Comparative Law Review, 2012; 3(2): 83-100. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2012.32113
)