The necessity to protect to parliament and its members led to determine a particular privilege named parliamentary immunity . To define and justify the necessity of it, different theories have been introduced. The legal supports which observe the parliamentary immunity, can be generally studied in two categories with distinct descriptions and effects. First, is called "the principle of non-liability". Second, it supports the members of parliament against legal proceedings, arrest, imprisonment and the rest judicial measures, except by the permission and allowance of the respective parliament .
In this article, based on a comparative study, Approach to Iran and Afghanistan in the forms of parliamentary immunity has been investigated. The study results show that In Iran, Representatives are only entitled to one of the forms of parliamentary immunity. But in Afghanistan,are accepted Admission forms of parliamentary immunity on a integrative approach.
Habibzade, M. J., Vaziri, S., & Mirmajidi, S. S. (2012). Criminal immunity of MPs in
Iran and Afghanistan. Comparative Law Review, 2(2), 43-72.
MLA
Mohammad Jafar Habibzade; Sara Vaziri; Seyedeh Sepideh Mirmajidi. "Criminal immunity of MPs in
Iran and Afghanistan", Comparative Law Review, 2, 2, 2012, 43-72.
HARVARD
Habibzade, M. J., Vaziri, S., Mirmajidi, S. S. (2012). 'Criminal immunity of MPs in
Iran and Afghanistan', Comparative Law Review, 2(2), pp. 43-72.
VANCOUVER
Habibzade, M. J., Vaziri, S., Mirmajidi, S. S. Criminal immunity of MPs in
Iran and Afghanistan. Comparative Law Review, 2012; 2(2): 43-72.
)