The Role of Wrongdoer’s Intent in the Rules of International Jurisdiction in Defamation Claims with a Study of Iranian and United States Law

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Ph.D. in Private Law, Department of Law, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. university of Guilan. Rasht. iran.

10.22059/jcl.2025.389771.634718

Abstract

Sometimes, a person's reputation is harmed by someone who is in another and when the victim files a lawsuit, an international claim arises that requires determination of jurisdiction. Considering that defamation is an intentional tort, applying a jurisdictional rule that focuses on the defendant’s intent and its effects in a specific place seems beneficial. However, how can such a jurisdictional rule be effectively? Has this jurisdictional rule been recognized in Iranian and U.S. law? Using a descriptive-analytical method and library resources, this research examines the approach of these legal systems and evaluates the application of a jurisdictional rule based on the defendant’s intent and its effects. The findings of this research indicate that U.S. law has established a jurisdictional rule whereby the court has jurisdiction over a defamation claim if the focal point of the harm to the victim's reputation and the defendant’s intentional harmful act is within its territory. However, Iranian law has not recognized such a rule. The analysis reveals that while applying this rule could promote fairness between the parties, its high degree of flexibility may lead to inconsistencies in judicial approaches when exercising jurisdiction.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Comparative Law Review

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 01 September 2025

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics