Comparative Study of the Dual Functions of the Precautionary Principle in Civil Liability

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Faculty of Law and Political Science at Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. of Private Law of Faculty of Law and Political Science at Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

With the advancement of technology, the production of new products, and the creation of new activities, the community is sometimes exposed to serious risks. If these risks occur, considerable costs should be consumed to compensate them and, sometimes, the damage is irreversible. In the case of facing such dangers, the precautionary principle and the adoption of precautionary measures are deployed. This principle has been used in recent decades in domestic law, international procedures, and judicial procedures. In this article, by reviewing different votes issued in this regard in foreign courts, in particular, French courts, an attempt was made to examine the different aspects of this principle. The principle of precaution, as a legal and political principle, is used in two situations: 1) before the occurrence of damage 2) after the occurrence of damage. Thus, given the dual function of the precautionary principle, the two preventive and compensatory roles can be assumed for this principle, respectively. However, it is worth mentioning that the obligation to compensate for financial losses is only possible in the second case.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Akhawnd Al-Khorasani, M.K. (1989), Kafayat Al-osool, Vol. 2, 1 th ed, Qom: Al Al-beit  Institution (peace be upon them) to revive the heritage. (In Arabic)
  2. Al-Hosayni al-Shirazi, M. (2005), Access to the adequacy of assets, Vol. 5, 3 th ed, Dar Al-hekmeh. (In Arabic)
  3. Al-Kazemi Al-Khorasani, S.M.A. (1986), Benefits of Assets, Vol. 4, 1 th ed, Qom:  Institution of Islamic publishing. (in Arabic)
  4. Ambrus, M. (2012), "The precautionary principle and a fair allocation of the burden of proof in international environmental law", Review of Europran Community & International Environmental Law, 21 (3), pp. 259-270.
  5. Bigdeli, S. and Badiesanaye Esfahani, A. (2014), "The civil liability’s basis of genetically modified foods (transgenic); Comparative study in Iran’s law and international instruments", Comparative Law Review, No. 2, pp. 287-316. (in Persian)
  6. Boggio, A. (2005), "The compensation of the victims of the Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease in the United Kingdom", Medical Law International, Volume: 7, issue: 2, pp. 149-167.
  7. Borchard, E. (1924), "Government liability in tort", Yale Law Journal, vol. 34, Issue 1, pp. 1-45..
  8. Calliess, Ch., Stockhaus, H. (2012). "Precautionary Principle and Nanomaterials: Reach Revisited", JEEPL, pp.  113-135.
  9. Collart Dutilleul, F., (2001), " Rapport sur le principe de précaution (avis n °30)",  Édition du Conseil National de l' Alimentation (Ministere de l'agriculture).

10. Caranta, R., (2007), "the Precautionary Principle in Italian Law", in Le principe de precaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles, Bruylant.

11. Collart Dutilleul, F. (2003). "Le principe de précaution dans le reglement communautaire du 28 janvier 2002", vol. 1, Giuffre, pp. 239-264.

12. Dana, D.A. (2003), "A behavioral economic defense of the Precautionary principle", Northwestern university law review, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 1315-1346.

13. Degergue, M. (2007), "Les Avancees Du Principe De Précaution En Droit Administratif  Francais", in Le principe de precaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles, Bruylant.

14. Dehkhoda, A.A. (1994), Dictionary, 1 th ed., Tehran: Tehran University. (in Persian)

15. Fourcher, K. (2002),  "Principe de précaution et risque sanitaire", Harmattan:France.

16. Frenkel, M., Hommel, U., Rudolf, M. (2005), "Risk Management Challenge and Opportunity", Springer.

17. ­Friant-Pérrot, M. (2013), "Information et qualité des aliments : de l’étiquette à l’assiette, comment garantir au consommateur européen le choix de son alimentation", in Penser une démocratie alimentaire, Breger, Thomas, Vol. 1, 1 édition, Inida.

18. ­Gadbin, D. (2012), "Cheptel sous haute tension : du bon usage du principe de précaution", Droit rural n° 406, repère 8, Dalloz.

19. Garcia, F. (2008), "Le défaut Indécelable de la chose en droit de la responsabilité cicile", Thése de doctorat en Droit privé, Université de Nantes.

20. Gignon, M., Ganry, O. and others (2013), “The Precautionary Principle: Is it Safe", European Journal of Health Law, pp. 261- 270.

21. Godard, O. (2003), "Revisiting the precautionary principle under the light of 2002-2003 French and international events", Hal archives-ouvertes.  

22. Hanschel, D. (2007), "progress and the precautionary principle in administrative law country report on Germany", in Le principe de precaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles, Bruylant.

23. Hayati, A.A. (2014), "The concept of precautionary principle and its importance in civil responsibility", Journal of Islamic law, No. 2, pp. 185-206. (in Persian)

24. Jiang, P. (2014), "A Uniform Precautionary Principle Under EU Law", PKU transnational law review, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 490-518.

25. Juanjuan, S. (2013), "The international harmonization of food safety regulation in the light of the American, European and Chinese law", Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Nantes (Institut de Recherche en Droit Privé).

26. Kadkhodayi, A.A. and Salari, A. (2017), "Precaution, customary principle in the European Union?", Journal of Public Law Studies, No. 3,  pp. 561-583. (in Persian)

27. Kaletune, G. Ozadali, F. (2003), "Who should be involved in food recall planning and execution", The Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet, AEX-252-2003,available on the Internet at: http://ohioline.osu.edu/aex-fact/pdf/0252.pdf.

28. Karbasi, M.A. (1991), Platform assets, Vol. 5, 1 th ed, Beirut: Dar Al-Balagheh. (In Arabic)

29. Kretschmann Belmar von, P. (2012), "(In) correct and (in) complete communications during a foodborne illness outbreak: who is liable? Who has losses?", MSc Thesis, Wageningen University.

30. Kulla, H. (2007), "Progress and Precautionary Principle In Finnish Administrative Law", in Le principe de precaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles, Bruylant.

31. Lofstedt, R. (2014), "The precautionary principle in the EU: Why a formal review is long overdue", Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 137-163.

32. Lord. P. (2001), "Lessons from the BSE Inquiry", The Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology, vol.17 (2), pp. 1-16.

33. Mashhadi, A. (2014), "Substantive constitutionalization of right to environment in Iranian & French Law", Comparative Law Review, No.2, pp. 559-580. (in Persian)

34. McNelis, N. (2000), "Eu Communication On The Precautionary Principle", journal of International Economic Law, pp. 545-551.

35. Mohammadzadeh Vadghani, A.R. (2015), "The Principle of Precaution in the Law of Agricultural Sciences and the Environment", Law Quarterly Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, No. 3, pp. 471-486. (in Persian)

36. Mousavi, F. and Arashpour, A.R. (2015), "The importance of the precautionary principle in international environmental law", Journal of Public Law Studies, No. 2, pp. 167-179. (in Persian)

37. Musa-zadeh, R. (2002), Administrative Law (2.1) Generalities and Iran, 3 th ed., Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)

38. Puttagunta, P.S. (2001). "The Precautionary Principle in the Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms", Healh Law Review, Volume 9, Number 2, pp. 10-18.

39. Sadeleer, N. (2006), "The Precautionary Principle in EC Health and Environmental Law", European Law Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 139–172.

40. Salimi Torkamani, H. (2011), "investigating Environmental Problems of Orumieh Lake based on International Environmental Law", Rahbord, No. 58, pp. 177-202. (in Persian)

41. Stevens, M. (2002), "The precautionary principle in the international arena", Sustainable development law & policy, pp. 13-15.

42. Tabatabai Motameni, M. (1994), Administrative law, 1 th ed., Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)

43. Tillotson, J. Foster, N. (2003), "Text, Cases and Materials on European Union Law, 4th edition", Cavendish Publishing Limited: London.

44. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, (2005), "precautionary Principle World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology", workshops of UNESCO: France.

45. Van Lang, A. (2016), "Droit de l'environnement, 4e edition", mise à jour Puf: France

46. Vapnek, J. Spreij, M. ( 2005), "Perspectives and guidelines on food legislation, with a new model food law", FAO Legal Office: Rome.

47. Weir, E. Schabas, R. and others (2010), "A Canadian Framework for Applying the Precautionary Principle to Public Health Issues", Vol 101, No 5, Can J Public Health.

48. Xiao, Z. (2015), "Conflict and balance between environmental protection and trade liberalization general and particular applying elements of the precautionary principle in international trade",  Frontiers of law in China, Vol 10, No 2, pp. 245-267.

49. Zarghoosh, M. (2013), Civil responsibility of the government and its employees. 1 th ed., Tehran: Forest. (in Persian)

Regulation and Site

50. Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules, Official Journal L 165/1, April 30, 2004.

51. BBC News, BSE and CJD crisis chronology, available on the Internet at:  <http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/health/2000/bse/> (last accessed on 23/03/2018).

Comparative Law Review
Volume 10, Issue 2
Autumn & Winter
October 2019
Pages 407-428

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics